 |
Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-13900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 09-02-2023
If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-13900KF and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or many benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, 7zip, Prime95, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Gears 5, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Blender, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, RealBench, Blender, AIDA64, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900KF or Intel Core i7-13790F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13790F | 65% |
Core i9-13900KF | 68% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900KF is 4% better than Core i7-13790F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13790F | 61% |
Core i9-13900KF | 65% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 108.4 | 115.3 | | Valorant | 123.2 | 131.0 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.0 | 73.3 | | Apex Legends | 115.8 | 123.1 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.4 | 98.2 | | Overwatch | 99.8 | 106.1 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.0 | 90.4 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.6 | 65.5 | | Warzone | 96.1 | 102.2 | | Assassin's Creed | 103.5 | 110.0 | | Valheim | 102.3 | 108.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13790F | 107% |
Core i9-13900KF | 60% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13790F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900KF as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KF | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 470 | 525 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4751 | 5528 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 770 | 875 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10536 | 12292 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2680 | 3109 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30282 | 35375 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KF | | Single-Core | 2451 | 2841 | | Multi-Core | 51601 | 60297 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KF | | Single-Core | 2095 | 2287 | | Multi-Core | 20045 | 26728 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KF | | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | September 15, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 5.8 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.3 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 24 | | Threads | 24 | 32 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 33 MB | 36 MB | | Overclocking | No | y | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900KF is 4% better than Core i7-13790F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900KF has 8 more core than Core i7-13790F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13790F is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900KF is better: 27
However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-13790F and Intel Core i9-13900KF before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-13790F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-13900KF Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Core i9-12900E
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i9-12900TE
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
