|
Intel Core i9-12900KS vs Intel Core i9-10900F |
|
Processor comparisons 28-09-2022 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-12900KS vs Intel Core i9-10900F and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Gears 5, MATLAB, Blender, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, AIDA64, RealBench, Prime95, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, SuperPi, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, 7zip. Gaming performance of processors in: - Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fortnite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900F or Intel Core i9-12900KS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900KS | 73% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900KS is 23% better than Core i9-10900F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900KS | 61% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.6 | 99.0 | Valorant | 123.4 | 112.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.1 | 63.0 | Apex Legends | 116.0 | 105.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.6 | 84.4 | Overwatch | 100.0 | 91.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.1 | 77.7 | DOOM Eternal | 61.7 | 56.3 | Warzone | 96.3 | 87.8 | Assassin's Creed | 103.7 | 94.5 | Valheim | 102.4 | 93.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900KS | 48% |
Core i9-10900F | 71% | To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-10900F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900KS as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 669 | 229 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6984 | 2516 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1113 | 524 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15520 | 5853 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3930 | 1353 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 44652 | 14644 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Single-Core | 4211 | 3085 | Multi-Core | 76561 | 20970 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Single-Core | 2187 | 1398 | Multi-Core | 20189 | 10825 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Announcement date | March 27, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Alder Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 5.5 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 4 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 16 | 10 | Threads | 24 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 30 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900KS is 30% better than Core i9-10900F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900KS has 6 more core than Core i9-10900F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KS is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900F is better: 2 However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900KS and Intel Core i9-10900F before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i9-12900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-10900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|