|
Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-10900F |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-10900F and decide which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is useful information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), DaVinci Resolve Studio, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, RealBench, Gears 5, WPrime, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, PCMark 10, SuperPi, PassMark, AIDA64, Prime95, Blender, 7zip. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900F or Intel Core i5-13600T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600T | 62% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600T is 9% better than Core i9-10900F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600T | 57% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.8 | 99.0 | Valorant | 114.5 | 112.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.1 | 63.0 | Apex Legends | 107.6 | 105.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.9 | 84.4 | Overwatch | 92.8 | 91.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.0 | 77.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.3 | 56.3 | Warzone | 89.3 | 87.8 | Assassin's Creed | 96.2 | 94.5 | Valheim | 95.0 | 93.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600T | 164% |
Core i9-10900F | 71% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900F since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 380 | 229 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3868 | 2516 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 626 | 524 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8582 | 5853 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2182 | 1353 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 24668 | 14644 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Single-Core | 1995 | 3085 | Multi-Core | 42036 | 20970 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Single-Core | 1730 | 1398 | Multi-Core | 12523 | 10825 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Announcement date | March 18, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 14 | 10 | Threads | 20 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 12 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13600T is 17% better than Core i9-10900F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13600T has 4 more core than Core i9-10900F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600T is better: 33
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900F is better: 3 However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13600T and Intel Core i9-10900F before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-10900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|