|
Intel Core i9-12900KS vs Intel Core i7-11700T |
|
Processor comparisons 28-09-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i9-12900KS vs Intel Core i7-11700T and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, video editing, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, PassMark, 7zip, VeraCrypt, Blender, 3DMark, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Gears 5, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, RealBench, WPrime, AIDA64. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11700T or Intel Core i9-12900KS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i9-12900KS | 73% |
Core i7-11700T | 57% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900KS is 21% better than Core i7-11700T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i9-12900KS | 61% |
Core i7-11700T | 55% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Control, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.6 | 97.0 | Valorant | 123.4 | 110.3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.1 | 61.8 | Apex Legends | 116.0 | 103.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.6 | 82.7 | Overwatch | 100.0 | 89.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.1 | 76.1 | DOOM Eternal | 61.7 | 55.1 | Warzone | 96.3 | 86.0 | Assassin's Creed | 103.7 | 92.6 | Valheim | 102.4 | 91.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i9-12900KS | 48% |
Core i7-11700T | 153% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-11700T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900KS as it consumes less power: 150W vs. 35W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i7-11700T | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 669 | 239 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 6984 | 2285 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 1113 | 558 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 15520 | 5121 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 3930 | 1455 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 44652 | 13552 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i7-11700T | Single-Core | 4211 | 3247 | Multi-Core | 76561 | 24722 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i7-11700T | Single-Core | 2187 | 1614 | Multi-Core | 20189 | 8864 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i9-12900KS |
Intel Core i7-11700T | Announcement date | March 27, 2022 | January 20, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Alder Lake | Rocket Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 12 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 5.5 MHz | 4.6 MHz | Frequency | 4 MHz | 1.4 MHz | Cores | 16 | 8 | Threads | 24 | 16 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 8200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 150 W | 35 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 50 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | L3 cache | 30 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900KS is 65% better than Core i7-11700T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900KS has 8 more core than Core i7-11700T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KS is better: 35
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11700T is better: 2 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i9-12900KS and Intel Core i7-11700T before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i9-12900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i7-11700T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F
| |
|