 |
Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i9-10900F |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i9-10900F and see which is better for games or normal use for rendering, streaming, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Furmark, UserBenchmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, Blender, SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Handbrake, Blender, Gears 5, PassMark, AIDA64, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, RealBench, WPrime, 7zip, MATLAB, 3DMark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900F or Intel Core i3-13100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13100T | 57% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100T is 1% better than Core i9-10900F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13100T | 54% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 99.0 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 112.5 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 63.0 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 105.8 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.1 | 84.4 | | Overwatch | 87.6 | 91.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 77.7 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 56.3 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 87.8 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 94.5 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 93.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13100T | 158% |
Core i9-10900F | 71% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900F as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video editing or video rendering, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 229 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2294 | 2516 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 358 | 524 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5114 | 5853 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1287 | 1353 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14731 | 14644 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | | Single-Core | 1174 | 3085 | | Multi-Core | 25118 | 20970 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | | Single-Core | 1659 | 1398 | | Multi-Core | 6987 | 10825 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i9-10900F | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 10 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 5.2 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 10 | | Threads | 8 | 20 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 9200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-13100T is 17% better than Core i9-10900F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-10900F has 6 more core than Core i3-13100T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100T is better: 13
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900F is better: 23
However, it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13100T and Intel Core i9-10900F before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-13100T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-10900F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i9-9820X
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i7-9800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12500TE
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i3-12100E
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Core i3-12100TE
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-1265UL
• Vs Core i5-1250PE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-7500
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6600
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
|
|
|
