|
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Intel Core i9-12900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 29-08-2022 Let's say you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX vs Intel Core i9-12900KS and decide which is better for games or simple use for streaming, rendering, programming, video editing, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip, PCMark 10, Blender, UserBenchmark, MATLAB, RealBench, Handbrake, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, 3DMark, PassMark, WPrime. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900KS or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | 79% |
Core i9-12900KS | 73% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is 7% better than Core i9-12900KS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | 69% |
Core i9-12900KS | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Control, Metro Exodus, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 122.4 | 108.6 | Valorant | 139.1 | 123.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 77.9 | 69.1 | Apex Legends | 130.8 | 116.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 104.3 | 92.6 | Overwatch | 112.7 | 100.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 96.0 | 85.1 | DOOM Eternal | 69.5 | 61.7 | Warzone | 108.5 | 96.3 | Assassin's Creed | 116.8 | 103.7 | Valheim | 115.5 | 102.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX | 18% |
Core i9-12900KS | 48% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900KS is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX as it consumes less power: 280W vs. 150W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 237 | 669 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 12717 | 6984 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 523 | 1113 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 26998 | 15520 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1355 | 3930 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 80814 | 44652 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Single-Core | 2966 | 4211 | Multi-Core | 98413 | 76561 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Single-Core | 1584 | 2187 | Multi-Core | 33731 | 20189 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX |
Intel Core i9-12900KS | Announcement date | March 08, 2022 | March 27, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | sWRX8 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Chagall PRO | Alder Lake | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 5.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.6 MHz | 4 MHz | Cores | 32 | 16 | Threads | 64 | 24 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 22600 millions | 12400 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 280 W | 150 W | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 4MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 32MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 256MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | y | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | Expansion Options
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900KS is 9% better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX has 16 more core than Core i9-12900KS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KS is better: 17 However, it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX and Intel Core i9-12900KS before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Intel Core i9-12900KS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|