|
Intel Core i5-13600HX vs Intel Core i9-10900F |
|
Processor comparisons 14-11-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13600HX vs Intel Core i9-10900F and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as Handbrake, PCMark 10, 7zip, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Furmark, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, SuperPi, WPrime, Prime95, MATLAB, PassMark, Blender, Gears 5, RealBench, AIDA64, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, VeraCrypt. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- DOOM: Eternal
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Borderlands 3
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-10900F or Intel Core i5-13600HX.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600HX | 59% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13600HX is 5% better than Core i9-10900F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600HX | 57% |
Core i9-10900F | 56% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.8 | 99.0 | Valorant | 115.6 | 112.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.8 | 63.0 | Apex Legends | 108.7 | 105.8 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.7 | 84.4 | Overwatch | 93.7 | 91.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.8 | 77.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.8 | 56.3 | Warzone | 90.2 | 87.8 | Assassin's Creed | 97.1 | 94.5 | Valheim | 96.0 | 93.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600HX | 152% |
Core i9-10900F | 71% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600HX is more energy efficient than the Core i9-10900F as it consumes less power: 40W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 282 | 229 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2765 | 2516 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 457 | 524 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6127 | 5853 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1566 | 1353 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17589 | 14644 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Single-Core | 1432 | 3085 | Multi-Core | 29964 | 20970 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Single-Core | 1835 | 1398 | Multi-Core | 13490 | 10825 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13600HX |
Intel Core i9-10900F | Announcement date | November 12, 2022 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1744 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 2.8 MHz | Cores | 14 | 10 | Threads | 20 | 20 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 40 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 6 MB | | L3 cache | 44 MB | 20 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-10900F is 14% better than Core i5-13600HX in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13600HX has 4 more core than Core i9-10900F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600HX is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-10900F is better: 6 However, it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13600HX and Intel Core i9-10900F before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600HX Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i9-10900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12100TE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1265UL • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|