|
Intel Core i7-3630QM vs Intel Core i5-8300H |
|
Processor comparisons 17-03-2021 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-3630QM vs Intel Core i5-8300H and see which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, machine learning, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Gears 5, PassMark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, AIDA64, SuperPi, PCMark 10, 3DMark, Handbrake, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, 7zip, UserBenchmark. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Valheim
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fallout 76
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Halo Infinite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-8300H or Intel Core i7-3630QM.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-3630QM | 51% |
Core i5-8300H | 52% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-8300H is 1% better than Core i7-3630QM. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-3630QM | 51% |
Core i5-8300H | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Battlefield V, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.1 | 92.4 | Valorant | 103.5 | 105.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.0 | 58.8 | Apex Legends | 97.3 | 98.7 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.6 | 78.8 | Overwatch | 83.9 | 85.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.4 | 72.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.8 | 52.5 | Warzone | 80.8 | 81.9 | Assassin's Creed | 87.0 | 88.2 | Valheim | 85.9 | 87.2 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-3630QM | 57% |
Core i5-8300H | 82% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-8300H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-3630QM as it consumes less power: 45W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 120 | 169 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 590 | 795 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 245 | 397 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1230 | 1689 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 722 | 1019 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 3469 | 3996 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Single-Core | 1699 | 2363 | Multi-Core | 5080 | 7583 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Single-Core | 780 | 1109 | Multi-Core | 3044 | 4352 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-3630QM |
Intel Core i5-8300H | Announcement date | January 01, 2012 | April 01, 2018 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | rPGA988B | FCLGA1151-2 | Core name | Ivy Bridge | Coffee Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 3 | 8 | Turbo Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 2.4 MHz | 2.3 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 5 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2100 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 45 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600 | DDR4-2666, LPDDR3-2133 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 41.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | Yes | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-3630QM is 4% better than Core i5-8300H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-3630QM is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8300H is better: 29 However, it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i7-3630QM and Intel Core i5-8300H before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i7-3630QM Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs 3020e • Vs 3015e • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i3-8100T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Pentium Gold G6400
Intel Core i5-8300H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10325 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
| |
|