|
Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-12900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 09-02-2023 If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-12900KF tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for programming, streaming, video editing, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or various benchmarks. A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, VeraCrypt, Dolphin Emulator, UserBenchmark, SuperPi, Handbrake, RealBench, Gears 5, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10, Prime95, WPrime, AIDA64, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 7zip, MATLAB, 3DMark, Furmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900KF or Intel Core i7-13790F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-13790F | 65% |
Core i9-12900KF | 66% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900KF is 1% better than Core i7-13790F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-13790F | 61% |
Core i9-12900KF | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 108.4 | 108.9 | Valorant | 123.2 | 123.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.0 | 69.3 | Apex Legends | 115.8 | 116.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.4 | 92.8 | Overwatch | 99.8 | 100.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.0 | 85.4 | DOOM Eternal | 61.6 | 61.9 | Warzone | 96.1 | 96.5 | Assassin's Creed | 103.5 | 104.0 | Valheim | 102.3 | 102.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-13790F | 107% |
Core i9-12900KF | 52% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13790F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900KF as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 470 | 474 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4751 | 4996 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 770 | 792 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10536 | 11107 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2680 | 2809 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30282 | 31962 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Single-Core | 2451 | 7320 | Multi-Core | 51601 | 54642 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Single-Core | 2095 | 1967 | Multi-Core | 20045 | 20514 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 16 | 16 | Threads | 24 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 24 MB | 14 MB | L3 cache | 33 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13790F is 4% better than Core i9-12900KF in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13790F is better: 11
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KF is better: 20 However, it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-13790F and Intel Core i9-12900KF before making a selection which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13790F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-12900KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
| |
|