 |
Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-13900KS |
|
Processor comparisons 09-02-2023
Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i7-13790F vs Intel Core i9-13900KS tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for streaming, video editing, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as VeraCrypt, PassMark, 3DMark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, Prime95, UserBenchmark, Blender, MATLAB, 7zip, WPrime, RealBench.
And how good the processors are in games: - Fallout 76
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-13900KS or Intel Core i7-13790F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-13790F | 65% |
Core i9-13900KS | 73% |
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-13900KS is 10% better than Core i7-13790F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-13790F | 61% |
Core i9-13900KS | 66% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Control, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 108.4 | 117.3 | | Valorant | 123.2 | 133.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 69.0 | 74.6 | | Apex Legends | 115.8 | 125.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 92.4 | 99.9 | | Overwatch | 99.8 | 107.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85.0 | 91.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 61.6 | 66.6 | | Warzone | 96.1 | 103.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 103.5 | 111.9 | | Valheim | 102.3 | 110.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-13790F | 107% |
Core i9-13900KS | 71% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13790F is more energy efficient than the Core i9-13900KS as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 470 | 631 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 4751 | 6774 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 770 | 1056 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 10536 | 15135 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2680 | 3757 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 30282 | 43688 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Single-Core | 2451 | 3134 | | Multi-Core | 51601 | 76304 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Single-Core | 2095 | 2675 | | Multi-Core | 20045 | 28679 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-13790F |
Intel Core i9-13900KS | | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | October 12, 2022 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 13 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 5.9 MHz | | Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.5 MHz | | Cores | 16 | 24 | | Threads | 24 | 32 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6500 | | Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L2 cache | 24 MB | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 33 MB | 36 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | Yes | Yes | | Part number | | Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-13900KS is 8% better than Core i7-13790F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-13900KS has 8 more core than Core i7-13790F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13790F is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-13900KS is better: 28
However, it should be understood that all the number in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i7-13790F and Intel Core i9-13900KS before deciding which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-13790F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-13900KS Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Apple M1 Max
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
• Vs Core i5-13490F
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
