 |
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs Intel Core i9-12900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G vs Intel Core i9-12900KF tests and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, machine learning, streaming, rendering. Here you can find useful information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like PassMark, Gears 5, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, Blender, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), MATLAB, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, AIDA64, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, SuperPi, Blender, Prime95, WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, 7zip. And how good the processors are in games: - Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Last Man Standing
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valorant
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900KF or AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 53% |
Core i9-12900KF | 66% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900KF is 19% better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 53% |
Core i9-12900KF | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.7 | 108.9 | Valorant | 106.5 | 123.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.6 | 69.3 | Apex Legends | 100.1 | 116.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.9 | 92.8 | Overwatch | 86.3 | 100.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.5 | 85.4 | DOOM Eternal | 53.2 | 61.9 | Warzone | 83.1 | 96.5 | Assassin's Creed | 89.5 | 104.0 | Valheim | 88.4 | 102.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G | 65% |
Core i9-12900KF | 52% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900KF since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 125W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video editing or video rendering, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 212 | 474 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1098 | 4996 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 513 | 792 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2577 | 11107 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1257 | 2809 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 6434 | 31962 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Single-Core | 2728 | 7320 | Multi-Core | 11825 | 54642 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Single-Core | 1275 | 1967 | Multi-Core | 5598 | 20514 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Announcement date | October 23, 2022 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | AM4 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Renoir | Alder Lake | Architecture | Zen 2 | x86 | Generation | 2 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.8 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 4 | 16 | Threads | 8 | 24 | Bus rate | | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 4000 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 125 W | Memory type | DDR4 | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 256KB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 2MB | 14 MB | L3 cache | 4MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | 100-000001079 100-000001079MPK | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900KF is 2% better than Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900KF has 12 more core than Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KF is better: 31 Although it should be understood that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G and Intel Core i9-12900KF before making a choice which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
Intel Core i9-12900KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
| |
|