|
Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-12900KF |
|
Processor comparisons 29-01-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13600T vs Intel Core i9-12900KF and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, programming, streaming. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as WPrime, Handbrake, 7zip, RealBench, Furmark, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, AIDA64, SuperPi, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, PassMark, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, Gears 5, Prime95, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark. And how good the processors are in games: - Grand Theft Auto V
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900KF or Intel Core i5-13600T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13600T | 62% |
Core i9-12900KF | 66% | The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900KF is 6% better than Core i5-13600T. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13600T | 57% |
Core i9-12900KF | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 100.8 | 108.9 | Valorant | 114.5 | 123.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.1 | 69.3 | Apex Legends | 107.6 | 116.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 85.9 | 92.8 | Overwatch | 92.8 | 100.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.0 | 85.4 | DOOM Eternal | 57.3 | 61.9 | Warzone | 89.3 | 96.5 | Assassin's Creed | 96.2 | 104.0 | Valheim | 95.0 | 102.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13600T | 164% |
Core i9-12900KF | 52% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13600T is more energy efficient than the Core i9-12900KF since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, streaming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 380 | 474 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 3868 | 4996 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 626 | 792 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 8582 | 11107 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 2182 | 2809 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 24668 | 31962 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Single-Core | 1995 | 7320 | Multi-Core | 42036 | 54642 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Single-Core | 1730 | 1967 | Multi-Core | 12523 | 20514 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13600T |
Intel Core i9-12900KF | Announcement date | March 18, 2023 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 14 | 16 | Threads | 20 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6500 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 12 MB | 14 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900KF is 12% better than Core i5-13600T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900KF has 2 more core than Core i5-13600T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13600T is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900KF is better: 27 Although it should be realized that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13600T and Intel Core i9-12900KF before making a selection which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13600T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i9-12900KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Core i5-13490F • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
| |
|