|
Intel Core i3-8145U vs Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-8145U vs Intel Core i5-L16G7 tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for rendering, programming, streaming, video editing, machine learning. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Blender, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, AIDA64, Prime95, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, 7zip, WPrime, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, RealBench, MATLAB, Gears 5, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Handbrake. And how good the processors are in games: - Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Borderlands 3
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-L16G7 or Intel Core i3-8145U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-8145U | 51% |
Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-8145U | 51% |
Core i5-L16G7 | 51% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: NBA 2K20, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Control, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter World, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 90.3 | 89.9 | Valorant | 102.6 | 102.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.4 | 57.2 | Apex Legends | 96.4 | 96.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.9 | 76.6 | Overwatch | 83.1 | 82.8 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.8 | 70.5 | DOOM Eternal | 51.3 | 51.1 | Warzone | 80.0 | 79.7 | Assassin's Creed | 86.2 | 85.8 | Valheim | 85.1 | 84.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-8145U | 226% |
Core i5-L16G7 | 430% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-L16G7 is more energy efficient than the Core i3-8145U as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 7W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-8145U |
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 160 | 107 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 338 | 251 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 296 | 272 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 521 | 577 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 491 | 794 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1905 | 1923 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8145U |
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | Single-Core | 2152 | 1605 | Multi-Core | 3810 | 3297 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8145U |
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | Single-Core | 1017 | 905 | Multi-Core | 2215 | 1869 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-8145U |
Intel Core i5-L16G7 | Announcement date | November 07, 2018 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FC-CSP1016 | Core name | Whiskey Lake | Lakefield | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 11 | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3 MHz | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 1.4 MHz | Cores | 2 | 5 | Threads | 4 | 5 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 6800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 7 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | LPDDR4X 4267 POP Memory | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 34 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8145U is 33% better than Core i5-L16G7 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more core than Core i3-8145U. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8145U is better: 22
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-L16G7 is better: 10 However, it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-8145U and Intel Core i5-L16G7 before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-8145U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
Intel Core i5-L16G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs 3020e • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
| |
|