|
Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs AMD 3020e |
|
Processor comparisons 11-01-2022 For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i5-L16G7 vs AMD 3020e tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing, streaming. Here you can find all information from many benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, Blender, MATLAB, AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, RealBench, 3DMark, PassMark, Handbrake, Furmark, Blender, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Prime95. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD 3020e or Intel Core i5-L16G7.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
3020e | 50% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-L16G7 is 1% better than 3020e. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-L16G7 | 51% |
3020e | 50% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Control, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 89.9 | 89.2 | Valorant | 102.2 | 101.4 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 57.2 | 56.8 | Apex Legends | 96.0 | 95.3 | Call of Duty Warzone | 76.6 | 76.0 | Overwatch | 82.8 | 82.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 70.5 | 69.9 | DOOM Eternal | 51.1 | 50.7 | Warzone | 79.7 | 79.1 | Assassin's Creed | 85.8 | 85.2 | Valheim | 84.8 | 84.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-L16G7 | 430% |
3020e | 333% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-L16G7 is more energy efficient than the 3020e since it has less power consumption: 7W vs. 6W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD 3020e | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 107 | 48 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 251 | 254 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 272 | 121 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 577 | 552 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 794 | 312 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1923 | 1501 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD 3020e | Single-Core | 1605 | 1473 | Multi-Core | 3297 | 2644 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD 3020e | Single-Core | 905 | 600 | Multi-Core | 1869 | 1186 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-L16G7 |
AMD 3020e | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | January 06, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FC-CSP1016 | Unknown | Core name | Lakefield | Dali | Architecture | x86 | Zen | Generation | 11 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 3 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Frequency | 1.4 MHz | 1.2 MHz | Cores | 5 | 2 | Threads | 5 | 2 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR4X 4267 POP Memory | DDR4 | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | 2400 | Memory bandwidth | 34 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | 1MB | L3 cache | 4 MB | 4MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | YM3020C7T2OFG
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-L16G7 is 14% better than 3020e in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-L16G7 has 3 more core than 3020e. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-L16G7 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which AMD 3020e is better: 5 However, it should be understood that all the data in the article above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-L16G7 and AMD 3020e before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i5-L16G7 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs 3015e • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core i3-8145UE • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-10110U • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-7101TE • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-7287U • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-8145U • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i7-6660U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y • Vs Pentium Gold G6400 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
AMD 3020e Processor Comparisons • Vs 3015e • Vs Celeron G5900 • Vs Celeron G5920 • Vs Celeron G5905 • Vs Core i5-6200U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050e • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Pentium Gold G6405U • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Athlon PRO 200U • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-5200U • Vs Core i5-3210M • Vs Celeron 6305 • Vs A6-9550 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Celeron J3455E • Vs Pentium Silver J5040 • Vs Pentium Silver N6005 • Vs Pentium Silver N6000 • Vs Pentium N6415 • Vs Pentium J6426 • Vs Pentium Silver A1030 • Vs Pentium N4200E • Vs Pentium 6805 • Vs Xeon D-1602 • Vs Core i3-10110Y • Vs Athlon Silver 3050U • Vs Celeron N5100 • Vs Celeron N4500 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050C • Vs Celeron N5095 • Vs Celeron N5205U • Vs Celeron N4020 • Vs Pentium Silver N5030 • Vs Core i3-L13G4 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150C • Vs Pentium 6405U • Vs Core m3-8100Y • Vs Core i3-7102E • Vs Core i5-6287U • Vs Core i3-6102E • Vs Core i5-4230U • Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200 • Vs Core i3-2105 • Vs Core i5-8210Y • Vs Core i3-7167U • Vs Core i3-7020U • Vs Core i3-8130U • Vs Core i5-8200Y • Vs Core i7-8500Y
| |
|