|
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Apple M1 |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023 You may have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Apple M1 and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Blender, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, AIDA64, 3DMark, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, UserBenchmark, Blender, Handbrake, SuperPi, PassMark, VeraCrypt, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Prime95, Furmark, Gears 5, 7zip, GeekBench 6, 5.2. And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Rainbow Six Siege
- DOOM: Eternal
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Borderlands 3
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Apple M1 or AMD Ryzen 7 5825C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, DOTA 2A, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Hitman 3, League of Legends (LOL), Forza Horizon 4, Control, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 94.8 | 95.8 | Valorant | 107.8 | 108.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.3 | 61.0 | Apex Legends | 101.3 | 102.4 | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.8 | 81.7 | Overwatch | 87.3 | 88.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.4 | 75.1 | DOOM Eternal | 53.9 | 54.5 | Warzone | 84.1 | 84.9 | Assassin's Creed | 90.5 | 91.5 | Valheim | 89.4 | 90.4 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the M1 is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 7 5825C as it consumes less power: 15W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, machine learning, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Apple M1 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 209 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1956 | 1163 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 474 | 402 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4279 | 1987 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1170 | 1512 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11896 | 7782 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Apple M1 | Single-Core | 2603 | 3413 | Multi-Core | 21502 | 22028 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Apple M1 | Single-Core | 1300 | 1746 | Multi-Core | 6695 | 7683 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Apple M1 | Announcement date | May 29, 2022 | October 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Laptop | Socket | FP6 | M1 | Core name | Barcelo | 4x Firestorm;4x Icestorm | Architecture | Zen 3 | hybrid (big.LITTLE) | Generation | 4 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 3.2 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Threads | 16 | 16 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 16000 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 15 W | Memory type | DDR4 | LPDDR4 - Up to 4266MHz | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 4266 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | | 2MB | L2 cache | 4MB | 16MB | L3 cache | 8MB | | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | APL1102 | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here M1 is 37% better than Ryzen 7 5825C in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Apple M1 is better: 22 Although it should be realized that all the data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 5825C and Apple M1 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Apple M1 Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i5-1155G7 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Core i5-11500H • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i5-1240P • Vs Core i5-1250P • Vs Core i7-1260P • Vs Core i7-1270P • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500E • Vs Core i5-12500TE • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i3-12100E • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5825U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-1270PE • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-1250PE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Celeron N5105 • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 3 7335U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 7520U • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
| |
|