 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
For example you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ tests and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, rendering, streaming, video editing. Here you can find all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like GeekBench 6, 5.2, PCMark 10, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, SuperPi, 7zip, PassMark, UserBenchmark, RealBench, AIDA64, Blender, Handbrake, MATLAB, Gears 5, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Furmark, Blender, Prime95, VeraCrypt.
And how good the processors are in games: - DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Valheim
- Borderlands 3
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700HQ or AMD Ryzen 7 5825C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 56% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 51% |
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 5825C is 8% better than Core i7-6700HQ. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 5825C | 53% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 52% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Half-Life: Alyx, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Control.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.8 | 91.7 | | Valorant | 107.8 | 104.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.3 | 58.4 | | Apex Legends | 101.3 | 98.0 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.8 | 78.2 | | Overwatch | 87.3 | 84.4 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.4 | 71.9 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.9 | 52.1 | | Warzone | 84.1 | 81.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.5 | 87.5 | | Valheim | 89.4 | 86.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 288% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 71% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 5825C is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6700HQ since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 148 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1956 | 692 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 474 | 361 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4279 | 1651 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1170 | 891 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11896 | 3958 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | | Single-Core | 2603 | 1937 | | Multi-Core | 21502 | 6493 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | | Single-Core | 1300 | 971 | | Multi-Core | 6695 | 3643 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | | Announcement date | May 29, 2022 | April 01, 2015 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP6 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Barcelo | Skylake | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 6 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.5 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.6 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 16 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 1880 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 34.1 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | 8MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-6700HQ is 23% better than Ryzen 7 5825C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 7 5825C has 4 more core than Core i7-6700HQ. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700HQ is better: 6
Although it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 7 5825C and Intel Core i7-6700HQ before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i7-6700HQ Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405T
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Core i5-4470S
• Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i5-7442EQ
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i5-8365UE
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-4670R
• Vs Core i3-8100T
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
