 |
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i7-7700HQ |
|
Processor comparisons 12-02-2023
If you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the AMD Ryzen 7 5825C vs Intel Core i7-7700HQ tests and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning, video editing. Here is all information from different benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like DaVinci Resolve Studio, RealBench, 7zip, PCMark 10, Prime95, WPrime, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, 3DMark, Gears 5, Handbrake, SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, AIDA64, Furmark, Blender, PassMark, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15).
And how good the processors are in games: - Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- Valorant
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valheim
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Halo Infinite
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-7700HQ or AMD Ryzen 7 5825C.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 56% |
Core i7-7700HQ | 52% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 7 5825C is 7% better than Core i7-7700HQ. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Ryzen 7 5825C | 53% |
Core i7-7700HQ | 52% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Monster Hunter World, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 94.8 | 92.0 | | Valorant | 107.8 | 104.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.3 | 58.6 | | Apex Legends | 101.3 | 98.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 80.8 | 78.4 | | Overwatch | 87.3 | 84.7 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.4 | 72.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 53.9 | 52.3 | | Warzone | 84.1 | 81.6 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.5 | 87.8 | | Valheim | 89.4 | 86.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, 4K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Ryzen 7 5825C | 288% |
Core i7-7700HQ | 74% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 7 5825C is more energy efficient than the Core i7-7700HQ since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, machine learning, programming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 162 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1956 | 762 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 474 | 390 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 4279 | 1701 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1170 | 961 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 11896 | 4271 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | | Single-Core | 2603 | 2053 | | Multi-Core | 21502 | 7006 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | | Single-Core | 1300 | 1009 | | Multi-Core | 6695 | 3936 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 7 5825C |
Intel Core i7-7700HQ | | Announcement date | May 29, 2022 | October 01, 2016 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FP6 | FCBGA1440 | | Core name | Barcelo | Kaby Lake | | Architecture | Zen 3 | x86 | | Generation | 4 | 7 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.5 MHz | 3.8 MHz | | Frequency | 2 MHz | 2.8 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 4 | | Threads | 16 | 8 | | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 6800 millions | 3300 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 45 W | | Memory type | DDR4 | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133, DDR3L-1600 | | Max. Memory | | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | | Memory bandwidth | | 37.5 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 4MB | | | L3 cache | 8MB | 6 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-7700HQ is 28% better than Ryzen 7 5825C in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 7 5825C has 4 more core than Core i7-7700HQ. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 7 5825C is better: 31
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-7700HQ is better: 6
Although it should be understood that all the data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of AMD Ryzen 7 5825C and Intel Core i7-7700HQ before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 7 5825C Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Core i9-8950HK
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-1038NG7
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i7-8850H
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i5-8259U
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 5125C
Intel Core i7-7700HQ Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Core i7-3770
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-3470
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i7-6700HQ
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-6500
• Vs Core i5-8250U
• Vs Core i5-10210U
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i5-4590
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-8550U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-4570
• Vs Core i5-2400
• Vs Core i5-4460
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i5-8265U
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs FX-6300 Six-Core
• Vs Core i5-7400
• Vs Core i7-4770K
• Vs Core i5-7300HQ
• Vs Core i3-9100F
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Core i5-3570K
• Vs Core i5-6400
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Core i7-3630QM
• Vs Core i7-8565U
• Vs Core i3-1005G1
• Vs Core i7-3770K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Pentium Gold 7505
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Pentium Gold G6500
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Core i3-9100TE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i3-1115G4
• Vs Core i3-10300T
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Core i3-9350K
• Vs Core i5-9300HF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550U
• Vs Core i3-10305
• Vs Core i3-10305T
• Vs Core i3-10105T
• Vs Core i3-10105F
• Vs Pentium Gold G6605
• Vs Pentium Gold G6505
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405
• Vs Core i3-1110G4
• Vs Core i3-1115GRE
• Vs Core i3-1115G4E
• Vs Core i3-1120G4
• Vs Core i3-1125G4
• Vs Athlon 300GE
• Vs Athlon 320GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Core i5-1030NG7
• Vs Core i3-10100T
• Vs Core i5-8260U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Core i7-10610U
• Vs Core i7-10510Y
• Vs Core i5-10310U
• Vs Core i7-8565UC
• Vs Core i7-1060NG7
• Vs Core i5-9400T
• Vs Core i7-8557U
• Vs Core i7-8665UE
• Vs Core i5-8257U
• Vs Core i5-8265UC
• Vs Core i3-9100T
• Vs Core i3-9320
• Vs Core i7-7820EQ
• Vs Core i3-9300
• Vs Core i3-8300
• Vs Core i3-9100
• Vs Core i7-8665U
• Vs Core i5-8365U
• Vs Core i3-9300T
• Vs Core i3-9350KF
• Vs Core i3-8100B
• Vs Core i5-8305G
• Vs Core i7-5850EQ
• Vs Core i5-8400T
• Vs Core i3-8300T
• Vs Core i3-8350K
• Vs Core i5-8350U
• Vs Core i7-8650U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
|
|
|
