|
Intel Core i3-8100T vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice by looking at the Intel Core i3-8100T vs Intel Core i7-6700HQ tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is useful information from different benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, Blender, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, 7zip, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Blender, Handbrake, VeraCrypt, PCMark 10, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, PassMark, Prime95, RealBench, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, WPrime. Gaming performance of processors in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Overwatch
- Valorant
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-6700HQ or Intel Core i3-8100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-8100T | 51% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 51% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-8100T | 51% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Microsoft Flight Simulator, League of Legends (LOL), DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Control, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 91.3 | 91.7 | Valorant | 103.8 | 104.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.1 | 58.4 | Apex Legends | 97.5 | 98.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 77.8 | 78.2 | Overwatch | 84.1 | 84.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 71.6 | 71.9 | DOOM Eternal | 51.9 | 52.1 | Warzone | 80.9 | 81.3 | Assassin's Creed | 87.2 | 87.5 | Valheim | 86.1 | 86.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-8100T | 83% |
Core i7-6700HQ | 71% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-8100T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-6700HQ since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 45W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 132 | 148 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 530 | 692 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 347 | 361 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1274 | 1651 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 685 | 891 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 2660 | 3958 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Single-Core | 1951 | 1937 | Multi-Core | 5323 | 6493 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Single-Core | 876 | 971 | Multi-Core | 3255 | 3643 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-8100T |
Intel Core i7-6700HQ | Announcement date | July 07, 2018 | April 01, 2015 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Skylake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 6 | Turbo Frequency | | 3.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.6 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 4 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 1880 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 6 MB | 6 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | Yes | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-8100T is 16% better than Core i7-6700HQ in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-8100T is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-6700HQ is better: 23 However, it should be realized that all the data that you have looked at here do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-8100T and Intel Core i7-6700HQ before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-8100T Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-10210Y • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i5-6442EQ • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i3-1000NG4 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400 • Vs Pentium Gold G7400T • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Pentium Gold G7400E • Vs Pentium Gold G7400TE • Vs Core i3-8121U • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Core i3-8109U • Vs Ryzen 3 3250C • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Athlon Gold 3150U • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-7350K • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Intel Core i7-6700HQ Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-2400 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-7200U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs FX-6300 Six-Core • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Core i5-6300U • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i7-7500U • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Pentium Gold G6500 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Pentium Gold G6605 • Vs Pentium Gold G6505T • Vs Pentium Gold G6505 • Vs Pentium Gold G6405T • Vs Pentium Gold G6405 • Vs Core i3-1110G4 • Vs Core i3-1115GRE • Vs Core i3-1115G4E • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Athlon Silver 3050GE • Vs Athlon 300GE • Vs Athlon 320GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 3350U • Vs Athlon PRO 300U • Vs Core i5-1030NG7 • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-4470S • Vs Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i7-10510Y • Vs Core i5-10310U • Vs Core i5-7442EQ • Vs Core i7-8565UC • Vs Core i7-1060NG7 • Vs Core i7-8665UE • Vs Core i5-8265UC • Vs Core i5-8365UE • Vs Core i3-9100T • Vs Core i3-9320 • Vs Core i7-7820EQ • Vs Core i3-9300 • Vs Core i3-8300 • Vs Core i3-9100 • Vs Core i7-8665U • Vs Core i5-8365U • Vs Core i3-9300T • Vs Core i3-9350KF • Vs Core i3-8100B • Vs Core i5-8305G • Vs Core i7-5850EQ • Vs Core i5-4670R • Vs Core i5-8400T • Vs Core i3-8300T • Vs Core i3-8350K • Vs Core i5-8350U • Vs Core i7-8650U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
| |
|