|
Intel Core i7-8569U vs Intel Core i3-10325 |
|
Processor comparisons 18-01-2022 If there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i7-8569U vs Intel Core i3-10325 and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, rendering, streaming, video editing, programming. Here you can find useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or many benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Dolphin Emulator, Furmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, Handbrake, Gears 5, WPrime, AIDA64, SuperPi, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Prime95, PCMark 10, GeekBench 6, 5.2, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Blender, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, UserBenchmark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Overwatch
- DOOM: Eternal
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fortnite
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10325 or Intel Core i7-8569U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i7-8569U | 52% |
Core i3-10325 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i7-8569U | 52% |
Core i3-10325 | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Horizon Zero Dawn, Monster Hunter World, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.7 | 92.3 | Valorant | 105.4 | 104.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.0 | 58.7 | Apex Legends | 99.0 | 98.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.0 | 78.6 | Overwatch | 85.3 | 84.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.7 | 72.4 | DOOM Eternal | 52.7 | 52.4 | Warzone | 82.2 | 81.8 | Assassin's Creed | 88.5 | 88.1 | Valheim | 87.5 | 87.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i7-8569U | 143% |
Core i3-10325 | 70% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-8569U is more energy efficient than the Core i3-10325 as it consumes less power: 28W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 190 | 196 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 947 | 984 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 412 | 454 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 1802 | 2225 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1157 | 1183 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5762 | 4596 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Single-Core | 2857 | 2646 | Multi-Core | 9278 | 9196 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Single-Core | 1203 | 1376 | Multi-Core | 4632 | 4192 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i7-8569U |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Announcement date | July 07, 2019 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FCBGA1528 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 2.8 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 1900 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 28 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2400, LPDDR3-2133 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 37.5 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10325 is 28% better than Core i7-8569U in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-8569U is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10325 is better: 13 Although it should be understood that all the figures in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Be sure to watch the video tests and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i7-8569U and Intel Core i3-10325 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-8569U Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
Intel Core i3-10325 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
| |
|