|
Intel Core i5-8500 vs Intel Core i3-10325 |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022 For example you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-8500 vs Intel Core i3-10325 and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, streaming, programming, rendering, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Gears 5, MATLAB, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, PassMark, 7zip, Dolphin Emulator, Handbrake, WPrime, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, AIDA64, Blender, 3DMark, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15). And how good the processors are in games: - Watch Dogs Legion
- Valorant
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Valheim
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- DOOM: Eternal
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-10325 or Intel Core i5-8500.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-8500 | 52% |
Core i3-10325 | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-8500 | 53% |
Core i3-10325 | 52% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Microsoft Flight Simulator, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, NBA 2K20, Battlefield V.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.6 | 92.3 | Valorant | 106.4 | 104.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.6 | 58.7 | Apex Legends | 100.0 | 98.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.8 | 78.6 | Overwatch | 86.2 | 84.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.4 | 72.4 | DOOM Eternal | 53.2 | 52.4 | Warzone | 83.0 | 81.8 | Assassin's Creed | 89.4 | 88.1 | Valheim | 88.3 | 87.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-8500 | 57% |
Core i3-10325 | 70% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10325 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-8500 since it has less power consumption: 65W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-8500 |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 174 | 196 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 934 | 984 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 403 | 454 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2287 | 2225 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1052 | 1183 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 5612 | 4596 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8500 |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Single-Core | 2461 | 2646 | Multi-Core | 9554 | 9196 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-8500 |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Single-Core | 1114 | 1376 | Multi-Core | 5496 | 4192 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-8500 |
Intel Core i3-10325 | Announcement date | July 07, 2018 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1151 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Coffee Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 8 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 MHz | 4.7 MHz | Frequency | 3 MHz | 3.9 MHz | Cores | 6 | 4 | Threads | 6 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2460 millions | 2600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 9 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10325 is 23% better than Core i5-8500 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-8500 has 2 more core than Core i3-10325. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-8500 is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10325 is better: 12 However, it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-8500 and Intel Core i3-10325 before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-8500 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-9700TE • Vs Core i5-9600 • Vs Core i9-8950HK • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i7-9700T • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X • Vs Ryzen 3 2200G • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Core i5-4690K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
Intel Core i3-10325 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
| |
|