|
Intel Core i3-10325 vs Intel Core i5-10300H |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-10325 vs Intel Core i5-10300H and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming, video editing. Here is useful information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like SuperPi, 7zip, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, MATLAB, Handbrake, PassMark, Dolphin Emulator, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, AIDA64, WPrime, Prime95, RealBench, Gears 5. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fallout 76
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10300H or Intel Core i3-10325.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-10325 | 52% |
Core i5-10300H | 52% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-10325 | 52% |
Core i5-10300H | 52% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Ghostrunner, Metro Exodus, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Control, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 92.3 | 92.8 | Valorant | 104.9 | 105.5 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 58.7 | 59.1 | Apex Legends | 98.6 | 99.2 | Call of Duty Warzone | 78.6 | 79.1 | Overwatch | 84.9 | 85.4 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 72.4 | 72.8 | DOOM Eternal | 52.4 | 52.7 | Warzone | 81.8 | 82.3 | Assassin's Creed | 88.1 | 88.6 | Valheim | 87.0 | 87.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-10325 | 70% |
Core i5-10300H | 62% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-10325 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10300H as it consumes less power: 65W vs. 45W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for streaming, programming, machine learning, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-10325 |
Intel Core i5-10300H | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 196 | 189 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 984 | 841 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 454 | 456 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2225 | 2125 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1183 | 934 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 4596 | 4620 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10325 |
Intel Core i5-10300H | Single-Core | 2646 | 2626 | Multi-Core | 9196 | 8835 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-10325 |
Intel Core i5-10300H | Single-Core | 1376 | 839 | Multi-Core | 4192 | 4729 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-10325 |
Intel Core i5-10300H | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | January 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Laptop | Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCBGA1440 | Core name | Comet Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 10 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.7 MHz | 4.5 MHz | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 2.5 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Threads | 8 | 8 | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 2600 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 65 W | 45 W | Memory type | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | 41.6 GB/s | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-10325 is 35% better than Core i5-10300H in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-10325 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10300H is better: 18 Although it should be understood that the summary data in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-10325 and Intel Core i5-10300H before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i3-10325 Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3200GE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-10710U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i5-9500F • Vs Core i5-9500 • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i5-8600 • Vs Core i7-8850H • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Core i5-8600K • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
Intel Core i5-10300H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-4790K • Vs Core i7-6700 • Vs Core i5-1035G1 • Vs Core i5-9300H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500U • Vs Core i7-4790 • Vs Core i7-10510U • Vs Core i7-4770 • Vs Core i7-7700HQ • Vs Core i5-10210U • Vs Core i7-6700HQ • Vs Core i7-3770 • Vs Core i5-8250U • Vs Core i7-8550U • Vs FX-8350 Eight-Core • Vs Core i5-6500 • Vs Core i7-2600 • Vs Core i5-4590 • Vs Core i5-4570 • Vs Core i5-4460 • Vs Core i5-3470 • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i5-8265U • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Ryzen 3 3200G • Vs Core i5-8300H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i5-7400 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Core i7-4770K • Vs Core i5-7300HQ • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i3-9100F • Vs Core i5-3570K • Vs Core i5-6400 • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i7-3630QM • Vs Core i7-8565U • Vs Core i3-1005G1 • Vs Core i7-3770K • Vs Ryzen 5 3550H • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Pentium Gold 7505 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i3-10100F • Vs Ryzen 5 3350G • Vs Core i3-9100TE • Vs Ryzen 5 3450U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-10200H • Vs Core i3-1115G4 • Vs Core i3-10300T • Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE • Vs Core i3-9350K • Vs Core i5-9300HF • Vs Ryzen 5 3550U • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i3-10305 • Vs Core i3-10305T • Vs Core i3-10105T • Vs Core i3-10105 • Vs Core i3-10105F • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i3-1120G4 • Vs Core i3-1125G4 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 3 5300U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Core i3-10100T • Vs Core i5-8260U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U • Vs Core i5-10400T • Vs Ryzen 5 3350GE • Vs Core i3-11100B • Vs Core i7-1068NG7 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G • Vs Xeon E-2234 • Vs Ryzen 5 3400GE • Vs Core i7-10810U • Vs Ryzen 5 3580U • Vs Core i3-10300 • Vs Core i7-10610U • Vs Core i5-1038NG7 • Vs Core i5-9500TE • Vs Core i5-10400H • Vs Core i5-9600T • Vs Core i5-9400T • Vs Core i7-8569U • Vs Core i7-8557U • Vs Core i7-9850HL • Vs Core i5-1035G7 • Vs Core i5-1035G4 • Vs Core i5-9500T • Vs Core i5-8257U • Vs Core i5-8279U • Vs Core i7-8809G • Vs Core i5-8500 • Vs Core i7-8705G • Vs Core i5-8600T • Vs Core i5-9400H • Vs Core i7-8559U • Vs Core i5-8500B • Vs Core i7-8709G • Vs Core i5-8500T • Vs Core i7-8706G • Vs Core i5-8400H • Vs Core i5-8259U • Vs Ryzen 5 2500X
| |
|