 |
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|
Processor comparisons 12-01-2022 If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X tests and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, programming, rendering, streaming, machine learning. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or different benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests such as PassMark, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Blender, SuperPi, Furmark, PCMark 10, WPrime, Prime95, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 3DMark, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, VeraCrypt, 7zip, RealBench, AIDA64, Gears 5, Handbrake. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Fallout 76
- Overwatch
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Valheim
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Halo Infinite
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- DOOM: Eternal
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X or AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 58% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 58% |
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 9 6900HS | 55% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 58% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Hitman 3, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Microsoft Flight Simulator, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Metro Exodus, NBA 2K20, Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Control.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.1 | 102.9 | Valorant | 110.3 | 116.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.8 | 65.5 | Apex Legends | 103.7 | 109.9 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.7 | 87.7 | Overwatch | 89.4 | 94.7 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.1 | 80.7 | DOOM Eternal | 55.2 | 58.5 | Warzone | 86.1 | 91.2 | Assassin's Creed | 92.7 | 98.2 | Valheim | 91.6 | 97.0 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 9 6900HS | 152% |
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | 19% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 6900HS is more energy efficient than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 180W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, video rendering or video editing, machine learning, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 247 | 168 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2476 | 2986 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 590 | 411 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5437 | 6731 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1538 | 1035 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 13848 | 18780 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Single-Core | 3303 | 2253 | Multi-Core | 27389 | 26588 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Single-Core | 1602 | 1053 | Multi-Core | 8911 | 14599 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Announcement date | January 09, 2022 | July 31, 2017 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FP7 | sTR4 | Core name | Rembrandt | Whitehaven | Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen | Generation | 6 | 1 | Turbo Frequency | 4.9 MHz | 4 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.4 MHz | Cores | 8 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 32 | Bus rate | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 10200 millions | 11600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 180 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4 | Max. Memory | | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2667 | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 512KB | 1.5MB | L2 cache | 4MB | 8MB | L3 cache | 16MB | 32MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | FP7:100-000000545 FP7r7:100-000000561
| YD195XA8UGAAE YD195XA8AEWOF
| In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2% better than Ryzen 9 6900HS in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has 8 more core than Ryzen 9 6900HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS is better: 13
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is better: 22 However, it should be realized that all the number in the article above do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3700C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 9 7945HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7845HX • Vs Ryzen 7 7745HX • Vs Ryzen 5 7645HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7736U • Vs Ryzen 7 7735U • Vs Ryzen 5 7535U • Vs Ryzen 7 7730U • Vs Ryzen 5 7530U • Vs Ryzen 3 7330U • Vs Ryzen 5 5560U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6860Z
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i9-7920X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i7-11850H • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Core i7-1280P • Vs Core i5-12450H • Vs Core i5-12500H • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i3-12300HE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 5 6600H • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800U • Vs Ryzen 5 6600U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12500HL • Vs Core i5-12450HX • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Core i5-12600HX • Vs Core i3-12300HL • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i7-13700H
| |
|