Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7532 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7532

Processor comparisons   20-04-2023
   Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests AMD EPYC 7773X vs AMD EPYC 7532 and understand which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, video editing, programming, machine learning. Here is all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software like DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, Handbrake, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, PCMark 10, 7zip, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Prime95, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, PassMark, 3DMark, UserBenchmark, VeraCrypt, Furmark.
   And how good the processors are in games:
  • Death Stranding
  • Halo Infinite
  • Watch Dogs Legion
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Apex Legends
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
  • Fortnite
  • Last Man Standing
  • Overwatch
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Borderlands 3
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Valorant
  • Fallout 76
  • Valheim
  • Rainbow Six Siege

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 7532 or AMD EPYC 7773X.

 
AMD EPYC 7773X
AMD EPYC 7532

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 7773X74% EPYC 753267%
This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 7773X is 9% better than EPYC 7532. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 7773X80% EPYC 753275%
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite142.2133.3
Valorant161.6151.5
Cyberpunk 207790.584.9
Apex Legends151.9142.4
Call of Duty Warzone121.2113.6
Overwatch130.9122.7
Red Dead Redemption 2111.5104.6
DOOM Eternal80.875.8
Warzone126.0118.2
Assassin's Creed135.7127.3
Valheim134.1125.8
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 7773X16% EPYC 753219%
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7532 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 7773X since it has less power consumption: 280W vs. 200W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

If you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7532
Cinbench 15 Single-core248171
Cinbench 15 Multi-core98896988
Cinbench 20 Single-core481415
Cinbench 20 Multi-core2448514812
Cinbench 23 Single-core1115785
Cinbench 23 Multi-core5447438514

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7532
Single-Core27972217
Multi-Core7990156494

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7532
Single-Core13851146
Multi-Core5312444451

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!

AMD EPYC 7773X AMD EPYC 7532
Announcement dateMarch 22, 2022October 01, 2020
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP3
Core nameMilanRome
ArchitectureZen 3Zen 2
Generation32
Turbo Frequency3.5 MHz3.3 MHz
Frequency2.2 MHz2.4 MHz
Cores6432
Threads12864
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm7 nm
Transistors count86000 millions64000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)280 W200 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR4
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32003200
Memory bandwidth204.8 GB/s
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache768MB256MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCNoNo
Part number100-000000504
100-000000504​WOF
100-000000136
100-000000136WOF
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7532 is 8% better than EPYC 7773X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 7773X has 32 more core than EPYC 7532. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7773X is better: 29
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7532 is better: 2
   The summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7773X and AMD EPYC 7532 before deciding which of the processors to buy for gaming.
AMD EPYC 7773X - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 7532 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7773X Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 7532 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9634
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7252
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands