|
Unisoc UIS8141E vs Unisoc Tiger T616 |
|
Comparisons 03-11-2023 Full compare data of Unisoc UIS8141E vs Unisoc Tiger T616, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 3DMark, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, and how good the processors are in games Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Call of Duty, PUBG, Minecraft etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Unisoc UIS8141E or Unisoc Tiger T616.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Unisoc UIS8141E | 42% |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | Total score | 42551 | 154594 | CPU | 11923 | 43285 | GPU | 16177 | 58754 | MEM | 6807 | 24739 | UX | 7663 | 27829 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | Single-Core | 112 | 264 | Multi-Core | 519 | 1508 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Unisoc UIS8141E |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 18 | 32 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.1-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Unisoc Tiger T616 is 35% better than Unisoc UIS8141E in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Unisoc UIS8141E has 4 more core than Unisoc Tiger T616. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | Mali-G57 MP1 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 383.69 | # of Cores | 1 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.2 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 34.6 | 29.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 22.5 | 45.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.5 | 39.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 29.1 | 28.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 44.5 | 39.9 | Real Racing 3 | 40.2 | 56.7 | Sniper 3D | 29.8 | 72.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 41.1 | 72.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 26.5 | 72.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 32.8 | 59.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE-7 | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc UIS8141E is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T616 is better: 30 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Unisoc UIS8141E SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Unisoc Tiger T616 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|