|
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Unisoc Tiger T616 |
|
Comparisons 27-03-2023 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Helio G36 vs Unisoc Tiger T616, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Helio G36 or Unisoc Tiger T616.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHelio G36 | 7% |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | 11% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Helio G36 | 72% |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | 68% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHelio G36 | 5% |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | 8% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Helio G36 |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | Total score | 109300 | 154594 | CPU | 30606 | 43285 | GPU | 41543 | 58754 | MEM | 17493 | 24739 | UX | 19671 | 27829 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Helio G36 |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | Single-Core | 223 | 264 | Multi-Core | 983 | 1508 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Helio G36 |
Unisoc Tiger T616 | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 | 2x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W | Memory type | LPDDR3, LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2x LPDDR4(X) 1600MHz, 1x LPDDR3 933MHz | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 14.9 | 32 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | | 128 KB | L2 cache | | 2 MB | L3 cache | | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.1-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Helio G36 is 9% better than Unisoc Tiger T616 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 126.8 | 383.69 | # of Cores | 2 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 25.8 | 29.5 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 41.3 | 45.4 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 28.7 | 39.3 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 21.4 | 28.2 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 27.7 | 39.9 | Real Racing 3 | 83.8 | 56.7 | Sniper 3D | 91.2 | 72.2 | Need for Speed No Limits | 75.6 | 72.2 | Mortal Kombat X | 48.2 | 72.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 50.9 | 59.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 50 MP | 64 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 13 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | | LTE-7 | Download speed | 150 MBit/s. | 300 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Helio G36 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Unisoc Tiger T616 is better: 26 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Helio G36 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 659 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763V) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD) • Vs MediaTek Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Rockchip RK3566 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Unisoc Tiger T616 SoC Comparisons • Vs Samsung Exynos 9611 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9610 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs MediaTek Helio P95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Samsung Exynos 880 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Samsung Exynos 9609 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs MediaTek Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs MediaTek Helio P40 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 955 • Vs MediaTek Helio G25 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 950 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 • Vs MediaTek Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek MT6762VCB • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
| |
|