|
Qualcomm QCM5430 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 |
|
Comparisons 05-11-2023 Detailed testing data of Qualcomm QCM5430 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy QCM5430 or Kirin 985.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | QCM5430 |
Kirin 985 | Total score | 585984 | 423580 | CPU | 164069 | 118598 | GPU | 222675 | 160953 | MEM | 93766 | 67777 | UX | 105471 | 76252 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | QCM5430 |
Kirin 985 | Single-Core | 910 | 880 | Multi-Core | 3310 | 2995 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | QCM5430 |
Kirin 985 | Frequency | 2700 MHz | 2580 MHz | Cores | 6 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 5200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.7 GHz Kryo 670 Gold Plus 2x2.4 GHz Kryo 670 Gold 3x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 1x2.58 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 34.1 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCM5430 is 4% better than Kirin 985 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that QCM5430 has 2 more core than Kirin 985. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G77 MP8 | GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 906.58 | 628 | # of Cores | | 8 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.8 | 27.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 66.7 | 54.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 91.9 | 56.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 50.8 | 41.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 57.5 | 45.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 84.7 | 75.1 | Real Racing 3 | 114.3 | 98.4 | Sniper 3D | 146.8 | 106.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 128.5 | 89.9 | Mortal Kombat X | 119.7 | 73.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 119.7 | 73.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 192 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Modem QCM6490 5G | 21 | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 1277 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 175 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC enabled, GPS, GBeidou, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCM5430 is better: 36
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 985 is better: 7 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.
QCM5430 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm QCM4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
Kirin 985 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
| |
|