|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1, compare of GPUs Adreno 200 and Adreno 304. This performance comparison involves two processors: Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Snapdragon S1 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, GeekBench 6, 5, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat etc. After looking at the data of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 or Snapdragon S1 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 | 1% |
Snapdragon S1 | 1% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 | 26% |
Snapdragon S1 | -62% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 | 1% |
Snapdragon S1 | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 |
Snapdragon S1 | Total score | 17276 | 16789 | CPU | 4846 | 4695 | GPU | 6572 | 6379 | MEM | 2754 | 2691 | UX | 3104 | 3021 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 |
Snapdragon S1 | Single-Core | 45 | 44 | Multi-Core | 211 | 205 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 |
Snapdragon S1 | Frequency | 1260 MHz | 1000 MHz | Cores | 4 | 1 | Bit | 32 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 65 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 1x1.0GHz ARM Cortex-A9 | Power consumption (TDP) | 4 W | 4 W | Memory type | LPDDR 2/3 | LPDDR2 | Max. Memory | 2 Gb | 0.5 Gb | Memory Frequency | 533 | 266 | Memory bandwidth | 6 | 6 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 is 20% better than Snapdragon S1 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 has -3 more core than Snapdragon S1. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 304 | Adreno 200 | GPU Frequency | 400 MHz | 133 MHz | GFloPS | 19.2 | 2.1 | # of Cores | | | # of Shader Units | 24 | 8 | Display | 1280 x 800 pixels | 840 x 480 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 4.6 | 3.8 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 13.2 | 12.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 7.5 | 6.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 7.9 | 6.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 10.6 | 9.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 16.8 | 15.1 | Real Racing 3 | 15 | 12.1 | Sniper 3D | 12 | 13.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 12 | 9.7 | Mortal Kombat X | 8.6 | 7.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 8.3 | 8.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 8 MP | 5 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | HD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X5 LTE modem | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 is better: 2 Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
Snapdragon S1 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs MediaTek MT6572A • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT6575
| |
|