|
MediaTek MT8188J vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G |
|
Comparisons 18-06-2023 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek MT8188J vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, PassMark, Quadrant, Neocore, and how good the chips are in games Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy MT8188J or Snapdragon 690 5G.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMT8188J | 25% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 24% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MT8188J | 72% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 74% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMT8188J | 24% |
Snapdragon 690 5G | 21% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT8188J |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Total score | 360113 | 339723 | CPU | 100831 | 95116 | GPU | 136847 | 129086 | MEM | 57613 | 54361 | UX | 64810 | 61145 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT8188J |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Single-Core | 665 | 760 | Multi-Core | 2195 | 2587 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT8188J |
Snapdragon 690 5G | Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 12 nm | 8 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.0 GHz Kryo 560 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 8 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 1866 | Memory bandwidth | 28 | 14.9 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 128 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT8188J is 9% better than Snapdragon 690 5G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619L | GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 975 MHz | GFloPS | 486 | 486 | # of Cores | 2 | | # of Shader Units | | 316 | Display | 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 28.5 | 24.3 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 55.6 | 55.8 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 45.1 | 45.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 37.7 | 41.9 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 46.4 | 45.3 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 71.9 | 71.4 | Real Racing 3 | 67.6 | 80.3 | Sniper 3D | 72.1 | 59.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 81.1 | 82.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 72.2 | 66.6 | CSR Racing 2 | 58.4 | 59.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 192 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 16 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 355L | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | Snapdragon X51 5G Modem-RF System | Download speed | 750 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 300 MBit/s. | 900 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS, GNSS | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8188J is better: 17
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G is better: 22 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT8188J SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Allwinner A523 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Snapdragon 690 5G SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 875 • Vs Snapdragon 750G • Vs A13 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 600 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 820E 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs Unisoc T740 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T760 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc T770 Tanggula • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300
| |
|