|
MediaTek MT6753 vs MediaTek MT8321 |
|
Comparisons 11-03-2021 So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests MediaTek MT6753 vs MediaTek MT8321, comparison of GPUs Mali-T720 MP3 and Mali-400. This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6753 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT8321 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special test applications such as Vellamo, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, PCMark, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Geekbench, Octane V2, and how good the SoCs are in games Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Sniper 3D, PUBG etc. After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy MT6753 or MT8321 and which chip is better for gaming: Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench score Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge) Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gaming
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MT6753 |
MT8321 | Total score | 37157 | 21905 | CPU | 10397 | 6127 | GPU | 14113 | 8316 | MEM | 5954 | 3495 | UX | 6688 | 3950 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MT6753 |
MT8321 | Single-Core | 98 | 58 | Multi-Core | 454 | 267 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MT6753 |
MT8321 | Frequency | 1500 MHz | 1300 MHz | Cores | 8 | 4 | Bit | 64 | 32 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 (Single Channel) | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 4 Gb | 1 Gb | Memory Frequency | 667 | 667 | Memory bandwidth | 4 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6753 is 13% better than MT8321 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6753 has -4 more core than MT8321. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T720 MP3 | Mali-400 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 400 MHz | GFloPS | 35.7 | 3.6 | # of Cores | 3 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1920 x 1080 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 11.5 | 5.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 30.9 | 16.4 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 19.5 | 11.3 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 16.8 | 10.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 25.2 | 13.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 37.4 | 21.7 | Real Racing 3 | 29.3 | 22.6 | Sniper 3D | 25.4 | 14.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 35.1 | 20.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 28.3 | 18.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 25.4 | 14.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 16 MP | 8 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Upload speed | 50 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6753 is better: 32
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT8321 is better: 0 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6753 SoC Comparisons • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs Unisoc SC9853I • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro) • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T) • Vs MediaTek Helio P18 • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Unisoc UIS8141E
MT8321 SoC Comparisons • Vs Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WW • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs MediaTek MT6735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT6570 • Vs Atom x3-C3230RK • Vs MediaTek MT8312 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs Rockchip RK3126C • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6580P • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT6572 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 • Vs MediaTek MT6572M • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026 • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs Atom x3-C3130 • Vs MediaTek MT6589 • Vs MediaTek MT8389 • Vs Atom Z3735F • Vs MediaTek MT6582M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 • Vs MediaTek MT8312CW • Vs Atom Z2520 • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470 • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2 • Vs Atom x3-C3200RK • Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225 • Vs MediaTek MT6735T • Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE • Vs MediaTek MT8735P • Vs Spreadtrum SC5735 • Vs MediaTek MT8167A
| |
|