Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek MT6582M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek MT6582M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6582M vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, speed examination of GPUs Adreno 305 and Mali-T720 MP2.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6582M is dual-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests like Quadrant, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, GeekBench 6, 5, Mozilla Kraken, PassMark, AnTuTu, Octane V2, GFXBench, Vellamo, PCMark, Neocore, even the gaming performance of chips in Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Sniper 3D etc.

   After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy MT6582M or Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, Madout2, CSR Racing 2.


 
MediaTek MT6582M
Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MT6582M1% Snapdragon 400 MSM89281%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MT6582M24% Snapdragon 400 MSM892827%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MT6582M1% Snapdragon 400 MSM89281%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MT6582M Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
Total score2021621723
CPU56556078
GPU76738251
MEM32343472
UX36333901

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MT6582M Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
Single-Core5357
Multi-Core247265

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MT6582M Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
Frequency1300 MHz1600 MHz
Cores24
Bit3264
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration2x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W4 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2/3
Max. Memory2 Gb2 Gb
Memory Frequency433533
Memory bandwidth46
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache32 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB2 MB
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is 18% better than MT6582M in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that MT6582M has 2 more core than Snapdragon 400 MSM8928. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T720 MP2Adreno 305
GPU Frequency500 MHz450 MHz
GFloPS1721.6
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units24
Display1280 x 720 pixels1280 x 800 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile3.35.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)14.416.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra8.910.9
Call of Duty: Mobile6.28.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)10.912.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition18.120.2
Real Racing 311.119.1
Sniper 3D19.614.2
Need for Speed No Limits1619.6
Mortal Kombat X12.917.4
CSR Racing 212.514.2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution5 MP16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon LTE modem
Upload speed50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6582M is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 is better: 31
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors MT6582M and Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MT6582M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


MT6582M SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735


Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands