HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350 benchmark which processor is better

Kirin 955 vs Atom x5-Z8350

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350, speed testing of GPUs Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) and Mali-T880 MP4.

This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 955 is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A72) and Atom x5-Z8350 is quad-core (SoFIA). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in software tests such as Octane V2, Vellamo, PassMark, PCMark, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Mozilla Kraken, GeekBench 6, 5, Quadrant, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Neocore, even the gaming performance of processors in Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chip is better to buy Kirin 955 or Atom x5-Z8350 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits, CSR Racing 2.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 955

Atom x5-Z8350

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 955

49%

Atom x5-Z8350

56%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 955

Atom x5-Z8350

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 955	Atom x5-Z8350
Total score	102680	59881
CPU	28750	16771
GPU	39011	22756
MEM	16436	9586
UX	18491	10778

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 955	Atom x5-Z8350
Single-Core	271	155
Multi-Core	924	697

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 955	Atom x5-Z8350
Frequency	2500 MHz	1440 MHz
Cores	8	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.4-1.9 GHz SoFIA
Power consumption (TDP)	5 W	5 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	4 Gb	2 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	1600
Memory bandwidth	25.6	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache		256 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 955 is 42% better than Atom x5-Z8350 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Kirin 955 has -4 more core than Atom x5-Z8350. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T880 MP4	Intel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail)
GPU Frequency	900 MHz	500 MHz
GFloPS	122.31	96
# of Cores	4	16
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	23.8	12.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	39.4	21.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	26.6	13.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	19.9	9.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	25.8	13.2
Real Racing 3	69	37.1
Sniper 3D	51.2	33.9
Need for Speed No Limits	63	29.7
Mortal Kombat X	63	33.9
CSR Racing 2	47.3	29.7

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	20 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Download speed	300 MBit/s.	21 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 955 is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x5-Z8350 is better: 5
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Kirin 955 and Atom x5-Z8350, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Kirin 955 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Kirin 955 specs and review.

Atom x5-Z8350 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10

• Atom x5-Z8350 specs and review.