HiSilicon Kirin 955 specs
HiSilicon Kirin 955 is a mid-range processor designed for mobile devices such as tablets and phones, announced in 2016. The CPU produced by a 16 nm process. The CPU has a octa-core configuration divided into two blocks. The first ARM Cortex-A72 is the fastest with four cores running at 2.5 GHz. The second ARM Cortex-A53 has four cores working at 1.8 GHz. The chip has support for 64-bit data. Mali-T880 MP4 GPU is responsible for working with graphical data. Devices that have the Kirin 955 installed can work in 4G networks. Maximum speed of download and send are 300 MBit/s and 50 MBit/s with the modem. You can find out whether Kirin 955 SoC is good or bad from comparisons with other processors and testing data.HiSilicon Kirin 955 specifications General Info Brand HiSilicon Name Kirin 955 Model Cortex-A72 Release date 2016 CPU configuration 4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A72, 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 Instruction set architecture ARMv8-A Frequency 2500 MHz Cores 8 Word Size 64 bit Process 16 nm Transistor count ? Technologies Hi-Fi audio DSP, coprocessor i5, VoLTE Power consumption (TDP) 5 W
Graphics GPU Mali-T880 MP4 Frequency 900 MHz Cores 4 Process 16 nm
Memory Type LPDDR4x Frequency 1600 MHz Max volume 4 Gb Internal type eMMC 5.1 Memory bandwidth 25.6 GB/s Memory bus 2x 32 Bit
Connectivity Download speed 300 MBit/s Upload speed 50 MBit/s LTE Cat Cat-10 DL/Cat-6 UL Wi-Fi ranges a/b/g/n/ac Location GPS,Galileo,Glonass,Beidou Wi-Fi ver. 5 Bluetooth ver. 4.2
Cameras Main camera max resolution 20 MPix Codecs 1920 x 1080, max FPS 60. Codec: H.264
Display and Audio Maximum Display resolution 2560 x 1600 pix Video encoding Resolution FullHD, max FPS 30. Codec: H.264 Audio codecs FLAC MP3 AAC LC HE-AACv2 HE-AACv1
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile • Antutu v10 • 3DMark HiSilicon Kirin 955 SoC Comparisons • Vs Tiger T310 • Vs Exynos 7 7904 • Vs Helio G35 • Vs Snapdragon 660 MSM8976 Plus • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7884 • Vs Exynos 850 • Vs Helio P40 • Vs Exynos 8 Octa 8890 • Vs Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 • Vs Kirin 710 • Vs Kirin 710F • Vs Kirin 710A • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7885 • Vs Helio X30 (MT6799) • Vs Snapdragon 460 • Vs Exynos 9609 • Vs Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro • Vs Helio P70 • Vs Snapdragon 670 • Vs Snapdragon 665 • Vs Exynos 9611 • Vs Exynos 9610 • Vs Kirin 970 • Vs Helio P60 • Vs Helio P90 • Vs Helio P65 (MT6768) • Vs Helio P95 • Vs Snapdragon 675 • Vs Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 • Vs Exynos 9 Octa 8895 • Vs Kirin 659 • Vs SC9863A • Vs Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 • Vs Helio P25 (MT6757T) • Vs Helio P20 (MT6757) • Vs Atom x5-Z8300 • Vs Snapdragon 625 MSM8953 • Vs Helio P30 (MT6758) • Vs Helio P23 (MT6763T) • Vs Snapdragon 450 SDM450 • Vs Exynos 7 Octa 7880 • Vs Atom x5-Z8350 • Vs Helio G25 • Vs Snapdragon 630 • Vs Kirin 950 • Vs Snapdragon 636 • Vs Helio X27 (MT6797X) • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 960 • Vs MediaTek Helio A25 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 • Vs MediaTek Helio X25 (MT6797T) • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Hexa 7872 • Vs MediaTek MT8768T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 MSM8976 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio X23 (MT6797D) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 MSM8956 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 • Vs MediaTek Helio P35 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 • Vs MediaTek Helio X20 (MT6797) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 • Vs MediaTek MT8176 • Vs Atom x5-Z8550 • Vs MediaTek Helio P22 • Vs Atom x5-Z8500 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884B • Vs Atom x7-Z8700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 MSM8953 Pro • Vs MediaTek Helio P25 (MT6757CD) • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon SiP1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs MediaTek MT8766 • Vs MediaTek MT8168 • Vs MediaTek MT8788 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S • Vs Qualcomm QCM2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS2290 • Vs Qualcomm QCS4290 HiSilicon Kirin 955 review VIDEO