|
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 |
|
Comparisons 29-10-2022 Full testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs Mediatek Dimensity 920, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, Vellamo, PassMark, and how good the chips are in games GTA, Call of Duty, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Fortnite etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Dimensity 9200 or Mediatek Dimensity 920.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreDimensity 9200 | 91% |
Mediatek Dimensity 920 | 37% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Dimensity 9200 | 84% |
Mediatek Dimensity 920 | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingDimensity 9200 | 89% |
Mediatek Dimensity 920 | 34% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 9200 |
Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Total score | 1268278 | 519330 | CPU | 355109 | 145419 | GPU | 481953 | 197342 | MEM | 202930 | 83087 | UX | 228299 | 93473 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 9200 |
Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Single-Core | 1450 | 832 | Multi-Core | 5272 | 2896 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 9200 |
Mediatek Dimensity 920 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 9200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 | 2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 52 | 24 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.4-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 9200 is 16% better than Mediatek Dimensity 920 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Immortalis-G715 MC16 | Mali-G68 MC4 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 3200 | 686 | # of Cores | 16 | 4 | # of Shader Units | | 128 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 48.1 | 61.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 150.3 | 55.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 90.9 | 61.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 83.6 | 61.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 128.2 | 49.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 185.4 | 75.2 | Real Racing 3 | 180.1 | 122.5 | Sniper 3D | 198.7 | 116.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 125.7 | 85.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 130.3 | 79.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 108.2 | 79.7 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 20 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 3500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3100 MBit/s. | 2000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5 | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 is better: 36
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 920 is better: 4 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 9200 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Mediatek Dimensity 920 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
| |
|