MediaTek Kompanio 800T vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U

Comparisons   30-08-2022
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Kompanio 800T vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Neocore, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, GTA etc.
   After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 800T or Dimensity 800U.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

31%

Dimensity 800U

23%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

78%

Dimensity 800U

76%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

28%

Dimensity 800U

22%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 800T	Dimensity 800U
Total score	431476	329621
CPU	120813	92292
GPU	163965	125254
MEM	69046	52742
UX	77673	59341

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 800T	Dimensity 800U
Single-Core	923	738
Multi-Core	3052	2510

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 800T	Dimensity 800U
Frequency	2400 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	17.07
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G57 MC3
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	486	512
# of Cores	2	3
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.5	30.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	55.5	42.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.3	53.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.3	48.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	47.6	35.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	77.3	59.7
Real Racing 3	102.1	66.6
Sniper 3D	110.1	101.3
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	95.9
Mortal Kombat X	67.7	61.3
CSR Racing 2	64.4	58.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	20 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	2300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	1200 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC	BeiDou B1I, QZSS L1CA, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1, GPS L1CA
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 800T is better: 22
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 800U is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Kompanio 800T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 800T specs and review.

Dimensity 800U SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 800U specs and review.