Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T

Comparisons   08-03-2023
   Full comparison data of Samsung Exynos 1380 vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Samsung Exynos 1380 or MediaTek Kompanio 800T.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Exynos 1380

31%

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

31%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Exynos 1380

89%

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Exynos 1380

28%

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

28%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Exynos 1380	MediaTek Kompanio 800T
Total score	418841	431476
CPU	117285	120813
GPU	159165	163965
MEM	67014	69046
UX	75388	77673

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Exynos 1380	MediaTek Kompanio 800T
Single-Core	750	923
Multi-Core	2036	3052

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Exynos 1380	MediaTek Kompanio 800T
Frequency	2400 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	4800 millions
Core configuration	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	8 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	1866	2133
Memory bandwidth	44	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.3-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G68 MP5	Mali-G57 MC2
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	1026	486
# of Cores	5	2
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	27.1	28.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.2	55.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.4	58.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	40.7	42.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	45.9	47.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	74.9	77.3
Real Racing 3	84.6	102.1
Sniper 3D	106.3	110.1
Need for Speed No Limits	67.7	93.9
Mortal Kombat X	64.5	67.7
CSR Racing 2	78.6	64.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	120	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5300	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3790 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1280 MBit/s.	1800 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo, GPS, Glonass, Beidou, SBAS, QZSS	GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 1380 is better: 13
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 800T is better: 23
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Exynos 1380 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Exynos 1380 specs and review.

MediaTek Kompanio 800T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 800T specs and review.