MediaTek Kompanio 800T vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820

Comparisons   30-08-2022
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 800T vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as PassMark, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of CPUs in GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 800T or Exynos 9 9820.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

31%

Exynos 9 9820

28%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

78%

Exynos 9 9820

69%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 800T

28%

Exynos 9 9820

26%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 800T	Exynos 9 9820
Total score	431476	399622
CPU	120813	111888
GPU	163965	151860
MEM	69046	63940
UX	77673	71931

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 800T	Exynos 9 9820
Single-Core	923	862
Multi-Core	3052	2930

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 800T	Exynos 9 9820
Frequency	2400 MHz	2700 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	8 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.7 GHz Exynos M3 Mongoose 2x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A75 2x1.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	9 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR4
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	2133
Memory bandwidth	24	31.1
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache		192 KB
L2 cache		1 MB
L3 cache		2 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 9 9820 is 11% better than MediaTek Kompanio 800T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MC2	Mali-G76 MP12
GPU Frequency	950 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	486	489.38
# of Cores	2	12
# of Shader Units
Display	2520 x 1080 pixels	4096 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.5	28.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	55.5	44.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	58.3	54.9
Call of Duty: Mobile	42.3	37.3
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	47.6	36.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	77.3	55.2
Real Racing 3	102.1	68.6
Sniper 3D	110.1	71.4
Need for Speed No Limits	93.9	76.9
Mortal Kombat X	67.7	71.4
CSR Racing 2	64.4	65.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	64 MP	22 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Five sensors supported ISP
Video Encoding FPS	240	120
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20 8CA
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	2024 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	316 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 800T is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Kompanio 800T SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 800T specs and review.

Exynos 9 9820 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 800T specs and review.