Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
AMD EPYC 7252 vs AMD EPYC 9634 gaming benchmark

AMD EPYC 7252 vs AMD EPYC 9634

Processor comparisons   19-03-2023
   If you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the comprehensive tests AMD EPYC 7252 vs AMD EPYC 9634 and decide which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, video editing, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as AIDA64, RealBench, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Dolphin Emulator, GeekBench 6, 5.2, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Handbrake, Furmark, Gears 5, WPrime, Blender, PCMark 10, PassMark, Prime95, Blender, 3DMark, VeraCrypt, DaVinci Resolve Studio, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), 7zip.
   And how good the CPUs are in games:
  • Valorant
  • World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
  • Cyberpunk 2077
  • Fortnite
  • Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
  • Apex Legends
  • Last Man Standing
  • Death Stranding
  • DOOM: Eternal
  • Fallout 76
  • Halo Infinite
  • Red Dead Redemption 2
  • Borderlands 3
  • Overwatch
  • Grand Theft Auto V
  • Assassin's Creed Valhalla
  • Valheim
  • Rainbow Six Siege
  • Watch Dogs Legion

   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD EPYC 9634 or AMD EPYC 7252.


 
AMD EPYC 7252
AMD EPYC 9634

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
EPYC 725255% EPYC 963494%
This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, EPYC 9634 is 41% better than EPYC 7252. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.

Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.
EPYC 725258% EPYC 963494%
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a little game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, NBA 2K20, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Control, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World, Horizon Zero Dawn.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite103.4165.4
Valorant117.5188.0
Cyberpunk 207765.8105.3
Apex Legends110.4176.7
Call of Duty Warzone88.1141.0
Overwatch95.1152.3
Red Dead Redemption 281.0129.7
DOOM Eternal58.794.0
Warzone91.6146.6
Assassin's Creed98.7157.9
Valheim97.5156.0
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.


Power consumption
EPYC 725227% EPYC 963415%
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the EPYC 7252 is more energy efficient than the EPYC 9634 since it has less power consumption: 120W vs. 290W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.

Software benchmarks

For example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance
AMD EPYC 7252 AMD EPYC 9634
Cinbench 15 Single-core242445
Cinbench 15 Multi-core185617927
Cinbench 20 Single-core433827
Cinbench 20 Multi-core412637987
Cinbench 23 Single-core14822016
Cinbench 23 Multi-core1107198767

Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7252 AMD EPYC 9634
Single-Core16154237
Multi-Core19724144876

GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
AMD EPYC 7252 AMD EPYC 9634
Single-Core10011331
Multi-Core1506675930

Comparison of specifications

In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The economy are obvious! It turns out that you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.

AMD EPYC 7252 AMD EPYC 9634
Announcement dateApril 01, 2020November 10, 2022
TypeServerServer
SocketSP3SP5
Core nameRomeGenoa
ArchitectureZen 2Zen 4
Generation24
Turbo Frequency3.2 MHz3.7 MHz
Frequency3.1 MHz2.25 MHz
Cores884
Threads16168
Bus rate
Bit6464
Lithography7 nm5 nm
Transistors count42000 millions116000 millions
Power consumption (TDP)120 W290 W
Memory typeDDR4DDR5
Max. Memory
Memory Frequency32004800
Memory bandwidth85 GByte/s460.8
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache64MB384MB
OverclockingNoNo
Supports ECCYesYes
Part number100-000000080
100-100000080WOF
100-000000797
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here EPYC 7252 is 27% better than EPYC 9634 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that EPYC 9634 has 76 more core than EPYC 7252. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).

Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 7252 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which AMD EPYC 9634 is better: 29
   Although it should be realized that all the figures in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch the testing video and read the reviews of of people who bought AMD EPYC 7252 and AMD EPYC 9634 before making a selection which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD EPYC 7252 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score
AMD EPYC 9634 - all data

•  Cinebench r15 score
•  Cinebench r20 score
•  Cinebench r23 score
•  GeekBench 6, 5.2 score


AMD EPYC 7252 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+


AMD EPYC 9634 Processor Comparisons
• Vs EPYC 7643
• Vs EPYC 7F72
• Vs EPYC 7502
• Vs EPYC 7513
• Vs Xeon Gold 6248R
• Vs EPYC 7763
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs EPYC 73F3
• Vs EPYC 7452
• Vs EPYC 7F52
• Vs EPYC 9654P
• Vs EPYC 7453
• Vs EPYC 72F3
• Vs EPYC 7713P
• Vs Xeon E-2234
• Vs EPYC 7663
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M
• Vs EPYC 7702
• Vs EPYC 75F3
• Vs EPYC 9654
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs EPYC 7742
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs EPYC 7272
• Vs EPYC 7713
• Vs EPYC 7443
• Vs EPYC 7543P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs EPYC 7413
• Vs EPYC 7543
• Vs EPYC 7343
• Vs EPYC 7443P
• Vs Xeon Gold 6242R
• Vs EPYC 7313P
• Vs Xeon W-3275M
• Vs EPYC 7313
• Vs EPYC 74F3
• Vs EPYC 9554
• Vs EPYC 9554P
• Vs EPYC 9534
• Vs EPYC 9124
• Vs EPYC 9224
• Vs EPYC 9174F
• Vs EPYC 9254
• Vs EPYC 9274F
• Vs EPYC 9334
• Vs EPYC 9354
• Vs EPYC 9354P
• Vs EPYC 9374F
• Vs EPYC 9454
• Vs EPYC 9454P
• Vs EPYC 9474F
• Vs EPYC 7232P
• Vs EPYC 7402
• Vs EPYC 7262
• Vs EPYC 7352
• Vs EPYC 7532
• Vs EPYC 7542
• Vs EPYC 7552
• Vs EPYC 7642
• Vs EPYC 7662
• Vs EPYC 7702P
• Vs EPYC 7H12
• Vs EPYC 7373X
• Vs Xeon Gold 5415+
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434
• Vs EPYC 7473X
• Vs Xeon Gold 6434H
• Vs EPYC 7573X
• Vs Xeon Bronze 3408U
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410T
• Vs Xeon Silver 4410Y
• Vs EPYC 7773X
• Vs Xeon Platinum 8444H
• Vs Xeon Gold 5416S
• Vs Xeon Gold 6416H
• Vs Xeon Silver 4416+
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands