|
Intel Core i5-11300H vs Intel Core i7-10700F |
|
Processor comparisons 19-03-2021 Let's say you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a choice after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-11300H vs Intel Core i7-10700F and understand which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here you can find all information from real video editing and streaming tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Blender, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, AIDA64, PCMark 10, Prime95, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator, 3DMark, Blender, RealBench, MATLAB, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Gears 5. And how good the processors are in games: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Watch Dogs Legion
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Death Stranding
- Halo Infinite
- Overwatch
- Borderlands 3
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Last Man Standing
- Rainbow Six Siege
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-10700F or Intel Core i5-11300H.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-11300H | 53% |
Core i7-10700F | 55% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-10700F is 3% better than Core i5-11300H. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-11300H | 53% |
Core i7-10700F | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Battlefield V, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, NBA 2K20, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Hitman 3, Monster Hunter World.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 93.8 | 97.9 | Valorant | 106.6 | 111.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 59.7 | 62.3 | Apex Legends | 100.2 | 104.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 79.9 | 83.4 | Overwatch | 86.3 | 90.1 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 73.5 | 76.7 | DOOM Eternal | 53.3 | 55.6 | Warzone | 83.1 | 86.7 | Assassin's Creed | 89.5 | 93.4 | Valheim | 88.5 | 92.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-11300H | 147% |
Core i7-10700F | 66% | To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-11300H is more energy efficient than the Core i7-10700F as it consumes less power: 32W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-11300H |
Intel Core i7-10700F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 199 | 214 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 1406 | 2291 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 691 | 499 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 2464 | 4834 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1771 | 1255 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 7798 | 12250 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-11300H |
Intel Core i7-10700F | Single-Core | 3649 | 2904 | Multi-Core | 13096 | 17150 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-11300H |
Intel Core i7-10700F | Single-Core | 1419 | 1304 | Multi-Core | 5677 | 9673 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-11300H |
Intel Core i7-10700F | Announcement date | April 01, 2020 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | BGA1526 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Tiger Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 11 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.4 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.1 MHz | 2.9 MHz | Cores | 4 | 8 | Threads | 8 | 16 | Bus rate | 2 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 5400 millions | 6800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 32 W | 65 W | Memory type | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | DDR4-2933 | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | | | Memory bandwidth | | 45.8 GB/s | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 16 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-11300H is 6% better than Core i7-10700F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-10700F has 4 more core than Core i5-11300H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11300H is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-10700F is better: 25 However, it should be realized that the summary data in the table above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-11300H and Intel Core i7-10700F before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-11300H Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i5-1130G7 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i7-1185G7 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Core i5-1145GRE • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i5-1145G7E • Vs Core i7-1185G7E • Vs Core i7-1180G7 • Vs Core i7-1185GRE • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 3 5400U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Ryzen 3 4300G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U • Vs Core i5-10500T • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-1195G7 • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Ryzen 3 5425U • Vs Core i7-9750HF • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i7-9850H • Vs Core i7-8700B • Vs Ryzen 5 3500 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Ryzen 5 5625C • Vs Ryzen 7 5825C • Vs Ryzen 3 5425C • Vs Ryzen 7 3750H • Vs Ryzen 5 3500C • Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS • Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
Intel Core i7-10700F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 7 5700U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Core i9-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-9820X • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 9 4900H • Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i9-10900E • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i5-1240U • Vs Core i7-1250U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Core i5-1235U • Vs Core i5-1245U • Vs Core i7-1255U • Vs Core i7-1260U • Vs Core i7-1265U • Vs Core i3-1220P • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-1265UE • Vs Core i7-1255UL • Vs Core i5-1235UL • Vs Core i5-1245UL • Vs Core i5-1245UE • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i3-1220PE • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
| |
|