 |
Intel Core i7-1365U vs Intel Core i5-11300H |
|
Processor comparisons 30-01-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i7-1365U vs Intel Core i5-11300H and see which is better for games or simple use for streaming, machine learning, video editing, programming, rendering. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or different benchmarks. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like SuperPi, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, UserBenchmark, Blender, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, 7zip, PCMark 10, MATLAB, AIDA64, 3DMark, RealBench, Blender, Prime95, Gears 5, PassMark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Fortnite
- Halo Infinite
- Apex Legends
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Last Man Standing
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
After reading the results of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-11300H or Intel Core i7-1365U.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i7-1365U | 57% |
Core i5-11300H | 53% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-1365U is 7% better than Core i5-11300H. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i7-1365U | 56% |
Core i5-11300H | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Ghostrunner, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, League of Legends (LOL), Control, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Forza Horizon 4, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Half-Life: Alyx, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 98.6 | 93.8 | | Valorant | 112.0 | 106.6 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 62.7 | 59.7 | | Apex Legends | 105.3 | 100.2 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 84.0 | 79.9 | | Overwatch | 90.7 | 86.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 77.3 | 73.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 56.0 | 53.3 | | Warzone | 87.4 | 83.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 94.1 | 89.5 | | Valheim | 93.0 | 88.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i7-1365U | 371% |
Core i5-11300H | 147% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-1365U is more energy efficient than the Core i5-11300H since it has less power consumption: 15W vs. 32W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 306 | 199 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2303 | 1406 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 749 | 691 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5240 | 2464 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1764 | 1771 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 17293 | 7798 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Single-Core | 4141 | 3649 | | Multi-Core | 24215 | 13096 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Single-Core | 1671 | 1419 | | Multi-Core | 10364 | 5677 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i7-1365U |
Intel Core i5-11300H | | Announcement date | January 17, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | | Type | Laptop | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1744 | BGA1526 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Tiger Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 5.2 MHz | 4.4 MHz | | Frequency | 3.9 MHz | 3.1 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 4 | | Threads | 12 | 8 | | Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 2 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm | | Transistors count | 9800 millions | 5400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 15 W | 32 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 5200 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s Up to LPDDR5/x 6400 MT/s Up to LPDDR4x 4267 MT/s | DDR4-3200, LPDDR4x-4267 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 64 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | 2MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 8 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-1365U is 20% better than Core i5-11300H in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-1365U has 6 more core than Core i5-11300H. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-1365U is better: 32
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-11300H is better: 2
Although it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch the testing video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i7-1365U and Intel Core i5-11300H before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i7-1365U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i7-13700HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
• Vs Apple M1 Pro
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H
• Vs Core i5-13420H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Core i7-13700H
• Vs Core i5-13500HX
• Vs Core i5-1345U
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i5-13600H
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
• Vs Core i7-1355U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-1350P
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Core i5-13450HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Core i5-1335U
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H
• Vs Core i5-13500H
• Vs Core i9-13980HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Core i3-1220P
• Vs Core i5-1245U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Core i5-11500H
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-1260U
• Vs Core i5-1230U
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i7-1250U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825U
• Vs Core i9-12900H
• Vs Core i5-1235U
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Core i7-12800H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Core i7-12700H
• Vs Core i9-12900HK
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i7-1260P
• Vs Core i9-12900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900H
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-12650HX
• Vs Core i9-12950HX
• Vs Core i5-1240P
• Vs Core i5-11400H
• Vs Core i7-1265U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i5-1240U
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900HS
• Vs Core i5-1250P
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5875U
• Vs Core i5-1155G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Core i7-12850HX
• Vs Core i7-1360P
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-1255U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 5 3580U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3350U
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4450U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5675U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Athlon PRO 300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Core i3-1215U
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 5 3450U
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700C
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i3-1315U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-1370P
• Vs Core i7-13620H
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13800H
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS
Intel Core i5-11300H Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i5-1130G7
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5400U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-10500T
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-N305
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Core i5-1340P
• Vs Core i5-13505H
• Vs Core i5-1334U
• Vs Core i3-1305U
• Vs Core i7-13650HX
• Vs Core i7-13705H
• Vs Core i7-13850HX
• Vs Core i9-13900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625C
• Vs Ryzen 7 5825C
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425C
• Vs Ryzen 7 3750H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500C
• Vs Ryzen 5 7640HS
• Vs Ryzen 3 7320U
|
|
|
