|
Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i7-13700F |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i7-13700F and decide which is better for games or simple use for rendering, streaming, video editing, machine learning, programming. Here is useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), WPrime, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, Blender, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, UserBenchmark, 7zip, Gears 5, SuperPi, Prime95, PCMark 10, Furmark, AIDA64, DaVinci Resolve Studio, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake, 3DMark, Blender, PassMark. And how good the CPUs are in games: - Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Overwatch
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Death Stranding
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-13700F or Intel Core i5-13490F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13490F | 59% |
Core i7-13700F | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13700F is 9% better than Core i5-13490F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13490F | 57% |
Core i7-13700F | 61% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Hitman 3, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, League of Legends (LOL), Metro Exodus, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, Control, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG).
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.0 | 108.2 | Valorant | 114.7 | 123.0 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 68.9 | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 115.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 92.3 | Overwatch | 92.9 | 99.6 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 84.9 | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 61.5 | Warzone | 89.5 | 95.9 | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 103.3 | Valheim | 95.2 | 102.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13490F | 84% |
Core i7-13700F | 106% | To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-13700F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13490F as it consumes less power: 75W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, video rendering or video editing, streaming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU includes all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 462 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2964 | 4701 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 482 | 759 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6580 | 10429 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1674 | 2650 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18910 | 29979 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700F | Single-Core | 1530 | 2424 | Multi-Core | 32223 | 51087 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700F | Single-Core | 1895 | 2071 | Multi-Core | 12714 | 19844 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700F | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | January 12, 2023 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.2 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Cores | 10 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 75 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 9 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13700F is 19% better than Core i5-13490F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13700F has 6 more core than Core i5-13490F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13490F is better: 2
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700F is better: 30 Although it should be realized that all the number in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13490F and Intel Core i7-13700F before deciding which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13490F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i7-13700F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|