|
Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i9-12900F |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023 Let's say you can't decide which CPU to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i9-12900F and see which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, rendering, streaming, programming. Here you can find all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, Blender, Prime95, AIDA64, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Blender, SuperPi, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Furmark, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, RealBench, Gears 5, PassMark, WPrime, VeraCrypt, 7zip, MATLAB, UserBenchmark, Dolphin Emulator, DaVinci Resolve Studio. Gaming performance of processors in: - Fortnite
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valheim
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- Last Man Standing
After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i9-12900F or Intel Core i5-13490F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13490F | 59% |
Core i9-12900F | 65% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i9-12900F is 9% better than Core i5-13490F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13490F | 57% |
Core i9-12900F | 59% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a little game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Control, Metro Exodus, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn, Battlefield V, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Ghostrunner, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.0 | 104.5 | Valorant | 114.7 | 118.8 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 66.5 | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 111.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 89.1 | Overwatch | 92.9 | 96.2 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 81.9 | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 59.4 | Warzone | 89.5 | 92.6 | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 99.8 | Valheim | 95.2 | 98.6 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you compare it in one assembly with the video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13490F | 84% |
Core i9-12900F | 97% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i9-12900F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13490F as it consumes less power: 75W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for programming, machine learning, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the CPU includes all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 449 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2964 | 4734 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 482 | 750 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6580 | 10524 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1674 | 2661 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18910 | 30285 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Single-Core | 1530 | 6936 | Multi-Core | 32223 | 51775 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Single-Core | 1895 | 1904 | Multi-Core | 12714 | 16188 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i9-12900F | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | July 21, 2021 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Alder Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 12 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.1 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Cores | 10 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 12600 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 75 W | 65 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 9 MB | 12 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i9-12900F is 13% better than Core i5-13490F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i9-12900F has 6 more core than Core i5-13490F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13490F is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i9-12900F is better: 28 Although it should be understood that all the data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i5-13490F and Intel Core i9-12900F before making a choice which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13490F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i9-12900F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Core i9-10910 • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i5-11400H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
| |
|