 |
Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i7-11700F |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023
If you have difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i7-11700F and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, programming, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as 3DMark, WPrime, Blender, Gears 5, GeekBench 6, 5.2, SuperPi, RealBench, MATLAB, PassMark, AIDA64, 7zip, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, Prime95, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, VeraCrypt, Handbrake, UserBenchmark, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), PCMark 10.
And how good the CPUs are in games: - Halo Infinite
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Fortnite
- Valheim
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Borderlands 3
- Death Stranding
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Fallout 76
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Apex Legends
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Red Dead Redemption 2
After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-11700F or Intel Core i5-13490F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13490F | 59% |
Core i7-11700F | 57% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i5-13490F is 3% better than Core i7-11700F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13490F | 57% |
Core i7-11700F | 55% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Hitman 3, Ghostrunner, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Microsoft Flight Simulator, Metro Exodus, Control, DOTA 2A, Forza Horizon 4, Monster Hunter World, NBA 2K20, League of Legends (LOL), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.0 | 97.6 | | Valorant | 114.7 | 110.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 62.1 | | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 104.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 83.2 | | Overwatch | 92.9 | 89.9 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 76.5 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 55.5 | | Warzone | 89.5 | 86.5 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 93.2 | | Valheim | 95.2 | 92.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13490F | 84% |
Core i7-11700F | 88% |
To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i7-11700F is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13490F as it consumes less power: 75W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor turns on all cores and threads that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-11700F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 254 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2964 | 2432 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 482 | 594 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6580 | 5451 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1674 | 1548 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18910 | 14426 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-11700F | | Single-Core | 1530 | 3456 | | Multi-Core | 32223 | 26317 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-11700F | | Single-Core | 1895 | 1718 | | Multi-Core | 12714 | 9436 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-11700F | | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | January 20, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Rocket Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 11 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.9 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 2.5 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 8 | | Threads | 16 | 16 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 8200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 75 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-3200 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 50 GB/s | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 9 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 16 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13490F is 24% better than Core i7-11700F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-13490F has 2 more core than Core i7-11700F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13490F is better: 30
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-11700F is better: 5
However, it should be understood that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple quantitative comparison. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13490F and Intel Core i7-11700F before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13490F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i7-11700F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-10920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-7940X
• Vs Core i9-7960X
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i9-9940X
• Vs Xeon W-2275
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
• Vs Core i9-10940X
• Vs Core i9-7980XE
• Vs Xeon W-3245
• Vs Xeon Gold 6246R
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800HS
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i9-7920X
• Vs Core i9-10910
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Core i9-7900X
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-11950H
• Vs Core i9-11980HK
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i7-11850H
• Vs Core i7-12650H
• Vs Core i5-12600H
• Vs Core i7-1270P
• Vs Core i7-1280P
• Vs Core i5-12450H
• Vs Core i5-12500H
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500E
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i5-12600HE
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i3-12300HE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX
• Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800H
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 6800U
• Vs Ryzen 5 6600U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i7-1270PE
• Vs Core i5-12500HL
• Vs Core i5-12450HX
• Vs Core i5-12600HL
• Vs Core i5-12600HX
• Vs Core i3-12300HL
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M2 Pro
• Vs Apple M2 Max
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-13900HK
• Vs Core i9-13900HX
• Vs Core i5-13600HX
• Vs Core i9-13950HX
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-7600K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
|
|
|
