 |
Intel Core i5-13490F vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023
Perhaps you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision after reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i5-13490F vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 and understand which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, streaming, video editing, rendering, programming. Here is all information from real streaming and video editing tests or various benchmarks. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like GeekBench 6, 5.2, Gears 5, MATLAB, Prime95, 7zip, VeraCrypt, SuperPi, Handbrake, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, PassMark, Furmark, RealBench, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, 3DMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, WPrime, UserBenchmark, PCMark 10.
And how good the processors are in games: - Death Stranding
- DOOM: Eternal
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Apex Legends
- Overwatch
- Valheim
- Last Man Standing
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Fortnite
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Valorant
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processor is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 or Intel Core i5-13490F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i5-13490F | 59% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | 61% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is 3% better than Core i5-13490F. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i5-13490F | 57% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | 57% |
For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Microsoft Flight Simulator, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Half-Life: Alyx, NBA 2K20, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Control, Forza Horizon 4, DOTA 2A, Ghostrunner, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 101.0 | 100.5 | | Valorant | 114.7 | 114.2 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 63.9 | | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 107.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 85.6 | | Overwatch | 92.9 | 92.5 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 78.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 57.1 | | Warzone | 89.5 | 89.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 95.9 | | Valheim | 95.2 | 94.8 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i5-13490F | 84% |
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | 91% |
To make a finishing resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is more energy efficient than the Core i5-13490F as it consumes less power: 75W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has to the maximum to reach maximum performance. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 271 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2964 | 3624 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 482 | 637 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6580 | 8279 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1674 | 1735 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18910 | 22766 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | | Single-Core | 1530 | 3335 | | Multi-Core | 32223 | 37859 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | | Single-Core | 1895 | 1775 | | Multi-Core | 12714 | 12233 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most helpful will be the release date of the processor and the possibility of overclocking it. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in new games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i5-13490F |
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 | | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | January 12, 2021 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | AM4 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Vermeer | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 3 | | Generation | 13 | 5 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 10 | 12 | | Threads | 16 | 24 | | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 9400 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 75 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 2 MB | | | L2 cache | 9 MB | 6MB | | L3 cache | 24 MB | 64MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | | |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-13490F is 9% better than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 has 2 more core than Core i5-13490F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13490F is better: 25
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is better: 11
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should entirely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of of people who bought Intel Core i5-13490F and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 before making a decision which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13490F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE
• Vs Core i7-13790F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i7-11700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3350G
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
|
|
|
