|
Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i7-13700KF |
|
Processor comparisons 08-02-2023 For example you have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the detailed tests Intel Core i5-13490F vs Intel Core i7-13700KF and see which is better for games or simple use for rendering, programming, machine learning, video editing, streaming. Here you can find useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Handbrake, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, RealBench, PCMark 10, Dolphin Emulator, Blender, AIDA64, Gears 5, SuperPi, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), UserBenchmark, PassMark, MATLAB, DaVinci Resolve Studio, 7zip, 3DMark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, WPrime, Blender, Prime95. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Halo Infinite
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Death Stranding
- Fortnite
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Last Man Standing
- Valheim
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-13700KF or Intel Core i5-13490F.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i5-13490F | 59% |
Core i7-13700KF | 67% | This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i7-13700KF is 11% better than Core i5-13490F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i5-13490F | 57% |
Core i7-13700KF | 63% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below. List of less popular games in which CPU comparisons were performed: NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Control, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Hitman 3, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Half-Life: Alyx, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 101.0 | 111.9 | Valorant | 114.7 | 127.1 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 64.3 | 71.2 | Apex Legends | 107.9 | 119.5 | Call of Duty Warzone | 86.1 | 95.3 | Overwatch | 92.9 | 103.0 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 79.2 | 87.7 | DOOM Eternal | 57.4 | 63.6 | Warzone | 89.5 | 99.2 | Assassin's Creed | 96.4 | 106.8 | Valheim | 95.2 | 105.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i5-13490F | 84% |
Core i7-13700KF | 61% | To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i5-13490F is more energy efficient than the Core i7-13700KF as it consumes less power: 75W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum efficiency, the CPU turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700KF | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 293 | 497 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2964 | 5249 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 482 | 830 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 6580 | 11670 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1674 | 2951 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 18910 | 33585 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700KF | Single-Core | 1530 | 2697 | Multi-Core | 32223 | 57246 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700KF | Single-Core | 1895 | 2300 | Multi-Core | 12714 | 23407 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The newer the processor, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in the newest games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i5-13490F |
Intel Core i7-13700KF | Announcement date | February 07, 2023 | September 25, 2022 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1700 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Raptor Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 13 | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 MHz | 5.4 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 4.2 MHz | Cores | 10 | 16 | Threads | 16 | 24 | Bus rate | 16 GT/s | 16 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | 14200 millions | 14200 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 75 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 6500 | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | L2 cache | 9 MB | 8 MB | L3 cache | 24 MB | 30 MB | Overclocking | No | No | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | | | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i7-13700KF is 21% better than Core i5-13490F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-13700KF has 6 more core than Core i5-13490F. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-13490F is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-13700KF is better: 29 However, it should be realized that all the data in the text above do not mean that you should be guided entirely by them and trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i5-13490F and Intel Core i7-13700KF before making a choice which CPU to buy for gaming and which not.
Intel Core i5-13490F Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
Intel Core i7-13700KF Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-12950HX • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7702 • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX • Vs Core i9-12900HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i9-12900H • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs Core i9-12900HK • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs Core i9-12900E • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i9-12900TE • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5645 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE • Vs Core i7-13790F • Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X3D
| |
|