 |
Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Core i3-7020U |
|
Processor comparisons 20-01-2022
For example you are thinking about choosing a CPU, you will be able to make a decision after reading the detailed tests Intel Core i3-7102E vs Intel Core i3-7020U and see which is better for games or normal use for machine learning, programming, rendering, video editing, streaming. Here is useful information from real streaming and video editing tests or several benchmarks. A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Handbrake, Furmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, MATLAB, PCMark 10, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), SuperPi, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, 3DMark, 7zip, UserBenchmark, Gears 5, Blender, VeraCrypt, RealBench, WPrime, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Dolphin Emulator, AIDA64, PassMark.
And how good the processors are in games: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Overwatch
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Apex Legends
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fortnite
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Borderlands 3
- DOOM: Eternal
- Valorant
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i3-7020U or Intel Core i3-7102E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-7102E | 50% |
Core i3-7020U | 50% |
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-7102E | 50% |
Core i3-7020U | 50% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Forza Horizon 4, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Metro Exodus, DOTA 2A, NBA 2K20, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Hitman 3, Half-Life: Alyx, Horizon Zero Dawn.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 89.1 | 89.5 | | Valorant | 101.2 | 101.7 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 56.7 | 56.9 | | Apex Legends | 95.2 | 95.6 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 75.9 | 76.2 | | Overwatch | 82.0 | 82.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 69.9 | 70.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 50.6 | 50.8 | | Warzone | 79.0 | 79.3 | | Assassin's Creed | 85.0 | 85.4 | | Valheim | 84.0 | 84.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-7102E | 75% |
Core i3-7020U | 144% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-7020U is more energy efficient than the Core i3-7102E since it has less power consumption: 25W vs. 15W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. And TDP should be taken into account when choosing a processor cooling system. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video editing or video rendering, then the main parameter for you is its performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to reach maximum efficiency. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Core i3-7020U | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 99 | 94 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 256 | 227 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 252 | 258 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 595 | 609 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 424 | 434 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 1645 | 1682 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Core i3-7020U | | Single-Core | 1279 | 1328 | | Multi-Core | 2528 | 2586 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Core i3-7020U | | Single-Core | 568 | 648 | | Multi-Core | 1074 | 1432 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The savings are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-7102E |
Intel Core i3-7020U | | Announcement date | March 07, 2017 | July 07, 2018 | | Type | Embedded | Laptop | | Socket | FCBGA1440 | FC-BGA1356, FCBGA1356 | | Core name | Kaby Lake | Kaby Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 7 | 7 | | Turbo Frequency | | | | Frequency | 2.1 MHz | 2.3 MHz | | Cores | 2 | 2 | | Threads | 4 | 4 | | Bus rate | | 4 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 2000 millions | 1700 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 25 W | 15 W | | Memory type | DDR4-2400 | DDR4-2133, LPDDR3-1866, DDR3L-1600 | | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | | | | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 GB/s | 34.1 GB/s | | L1 cache | | | | L2 cache | | | | L3 cache | 3 MB | 3 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | Yes | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| Expansion Options
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-7020U is 8% better than Core i3-7102E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7102E is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-7020U is better: 23
Although it should be realized that the summary data in the text above do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-7102E and Intel Core i3-7020U before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-7102E Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Celeron N4020
Intel Core i3-7020U Processor Comparisons
• Vs Core m3-8100Y
• Vs Core i3-6102E
• Vs Core i5-4230U
• Vs Core2 Extreme Q9200
• Vs Core i3-2105
• Vs Core i5-8210Y
• Vs Core i3-7167U
• Vs 3020e
• Vs Pentium Silver N5030
• Vs 3015e
• Vs Core i3-L13G4
• Vs Celeron G5900
• Vs Celeron G5920
• Vs Celeron G5905
• Vs Pentium J6426
• Vs Core i5-6200U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050e
• Vs Core i7-8500Y
• Vs Celeron N5205U
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050U
• Vs Celeron N5100
• Vs Athlon Silver 3050C
• Vs Core i5-6300U
• Vs Core i5-L16G7
• Vs Ryzen Embedded R1305G
• Vs Pentium Gold G6405U
• Vs Core i5-7200U
• Vs Pentium Silver A1030
• Vs Core i3-10110Y
• Vs Celeron N5095
• Vs Core i3-8130U
• Vs Core i7-7500U
• Vs Athlon Gold 3150C
• Vs Pentium Silver J5040
• Vs Core i5-5200U
• Vs Pentium 6805
• Vs Celeron N4500
• Vs Xeon D-1602
• Vs Core i5-3210M
• Vs Pentium 6405U
• Vs Celeron J3455E
• Vs Core i5-8200Y
• Vs Celeron 6305
• Vs Pentium N4200E
• Vs A6-9550
• Vs Celeron N4020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
|
|
|
