|
Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i5-10600K |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023 Perhaps you can't decide which processor to buy, you can make a choice after reading the full tests Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i5-10600K and see which is better for games or normal use for video editing, streaming, programming, machine learning, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as 7zip, UserBenchmark, DaVinci Resolve Studio, MATLAB, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, 3DMark, SuperPi, AIDA64, RealBench, Blender, VeraCrypt, Furmark, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Prime95, PCMark 10, Handbrake, Gears 5, Dolphin Emulator, PassMark, WPrime, Blender. And how good the processors are in games: - Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Overwatch
- Last Man Standing
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Borderlands 3
- Halo Infinite
- Fallout 76
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Fortnite
- Valorant
- Valheim
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
After looking at the data of parallel benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processor is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i5-10600K or Intel Core i3-13100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Core i3-13100T | 57% |
Core i5-10600K | 54% | This shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100T is 5% better than Core i5-10600K. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Core i3-13100T | 54% |
Core i5-10600K | 55% | The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of other games in which CPU comparisons were performed: Shadow of the Tomb Raider, DOTA 2A, Control, Forza Horizon 4, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Horizon Zero Dawn, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20, Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Ghostrunner, Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Half-Life: Alyx.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 95.1 | 97.0 | Valorant | 108.1 | 110.2 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.7 | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 103.6 | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.1 | 82.7 | Overwatch | 87.6 | 89.3 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 76.1 | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 55.1 | Warzone | 84.3 | 86.0 | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 92.6 | Valheim | 89.7 | 91.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The computers participating in the comparing not only were the equipped with different video cards and different amounts of RAM. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Core i3-13100T | 158% |
Core i5-10600K | 39% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100T is more energy efficient than the Core i5-10600K as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 125W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, video editing or video rendering, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor uses all threads and cores that it has. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to make sure that the software that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that can use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10600K | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 215 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2294 | 1615 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 358 | 501 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5114 | 3629 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1287 | 1376 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14731 | 10379 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10600K | Single-Core | 1174 | 2967 | Multi-Core | 25118 | 14674 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10600K | Single-Core | 1659 | 1495 | Multi-Core | 6987 | 8815 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The newer the processor, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The economy are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i5-10600K | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | April 01, 2020 | Type | Desktop | Desktop | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1200 | Core name | Raptor Lake | Comet Lake | Architecture | x86 | x86 | Generation | 13 | 10 | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 4.1 MHz | Cores | 4 | 6 | Threads | 8 | 12 | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 4800 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 125 W | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | L1 cache | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | No | Part number | Expansion Options
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i5-10600K is 17% better than Core i3-13100T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i5-10600K has 2 more core than Core i3-13100T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100T is better: 14
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i5-10600K is better: 22 Although it should be realized that all the figures that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13100T and Intel Core i5-10600K before making a selection which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13100T Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 9 7900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Core i7-13700T • Vs Core i9-13900F • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Apple M1 Ultra • Vs Core i7-13700F • Vs Core i9-13900 • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i5-13600KF • Vs Core i7-13700 • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i7-13700KF • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Core i9-13900KF • Vs Ryzen 7 7700 • Vs Core i7-13700K • Vs Core i9-13900KS • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i5-13500T • Vs Core i9-12900T • Vs Core i5-13400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-11900T • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600 • Vs Core i5-13500 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i5-12400T • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i3-12300T • Vs Core i5-13600 • Vs Core i9-12900 • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i9-12900F • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i3-12100T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Core i3-12300 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Core i5-12500 • Vs Core i5-12500T • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12400F • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Core i3-12100 • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-12900K • Vs Core i3-12100F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700 • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i5-12600 • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Core i5-12600T • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-9900X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i9-10900X • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Ryzen 5 1600X • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Core i9-10900KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Core i9-10900F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Core i9-10900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Core i5-11500B • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Core i7-11700T • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 3 1200 • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i5-10600K Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Core i7-10750H • Vs Core i5-10400F • Vs Core i5-10400 • Vs Ryzen 5 1600 • Vs Ryzen 3 3100 • Vs Ryzen 5 4500U • Vs Core i7-9750H • Vs Core i5-9600K • Vs Core i7-1165G7 • Vs Core i7-8750H • Vs Core i5-1135G7 • Vs Core i7-7700K • Vs Core i5-9400F • Vs Ryzen 5 3400G • Vs Core i5-8400 • Vs Core i7-6700K • Vs Core i7-1065G7 • Vs Core i3-10100 • Vs Core i5-10300H • Vs Ryzen 5 2400G • Vs Core i7-7700 • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i5-9400 • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Xeon W-3175X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 3 3300X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Core i5-1145G7 • Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800 • Vs Core i7-1160G7 • Vs Core i3-10320 • Vs Core i7-9700E • Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4 • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE • Vs Xeon W-1290T • Vs EPYC 7F32 • Vs Core i5-10600 • Vs Core i5-10500 • Vs Core i7-10700T • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE • Vs Core i7-10870H • Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS • Vs Xeon Gold 6130T • Vs Ryzen 5 4600U • Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4 • Vs Xeon W-2235 • Vs Core i5-10600T • Vs Core i7-11800H • Vs Core i5-11600KF • Vs Core i5-11600 • Vs Core i5-11600T • Vs Core i5-11500 • Vs Core i5-11500T • Vs Core i5-11400 • Vs Core i5-11400F • Vs Core i5-11400T • Vs Core i5-1140G7 • Vs Core i5-11300H • Vs Core i7-11375H • Vs Core i7-11370H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U • Vs Ryzen 5 2600E • Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS • Vs Ryzen 5 5500U • Vs Ryzen 5 5600H • Vs Ryzen 5 5600U • Vs Core i7-10700KF • Vs Core i9-9900KS • Vs Core i7-7900X • Vs Core i9-10900T • Vs Core i9-9900KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 • Vs Core i7-9800X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Extreme Edition • Vs Core i7-7820X • Vs Ryzen 7 4800U • Vs Core i7-6950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X • Vs Core i9-9900 • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X • Vs Core i9-10980HK • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G • Vs Core i9-10885H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G • Vs Core i9-10880H • Vs Ryzen 7 1800X • Vs Core i5-10600KF • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE • Vs Core i7-9700KF • Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X • Vs Core i7-8086K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U • Vs Core i9-9900T • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700E • Vs Core i7-6900K • Vs Core i7-9700F • Vs Ryzen 7 1700X • Vs Core i7-5960X • Vs Core i7-7800X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 • Vs Core i7-10850H • Vs Ryzen 3 5300G • Vs Core i9-10900TE • Vs Core i5-11320H • Vs Core i5-11260H • Vs Core i7-11390H • Vs Xeon W-10855M • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U • Vs Xeon W-11855M • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Celeron 7300 • Vs Celeron 7305 • Vs Pentium 8500 • Vs Pentium 8505 • Vs Core i3-1210U • Vs Core i5-1230U • Vs Core i3-1215U • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U • Vs Ryzen 5 5625U • Vs Core i9-9880H • Vs Core i9-9980HK • Vs Core i3-1215UL • Vs Core i3-1215UE • Vs Core i9-12900KF • Vs Core i3-N305 • Vs Core i3-N300 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600 • Vs Core i9-13900T • Vs Core i5-13600T • Vs Core i5-13400T • Vs Core i3-13100F • Vs Ryzen 7 5700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5500 • Vs Core i3-13300F • Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE • Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X • Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 • Vs Core i5-7500 • Vs Core i3-8100 • Vs Core i5-6600K • Vs Ryzen 5 4500 • Vs Core i5-6500T • Vs Core i5-6600 • Vs Core i5-7600K • Vs Ryzen 5 1500X • Vs Core i3-7100 • Vs Core i7-5820K • Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE • Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE • Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE • Vs Ryzen 5 4600G • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4655G
| |
|