 |
Intel Core i3-13100T vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
If you are thinking about choosing a processor, you will be able to make a decision by looking at the Intel Core i3-13100T vs AMD Ryzen 5 3500X tests and decide which is better for games or normal use for video editing, rendering, programming, streaming, machine learning. Here is all information from various benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.
From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Dolphin Emulator, SuperPi, PassMark, Blender, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Blender, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Furmark, UserBenchmark, 3DMark, PCMark 10, Gears 5, RealBench, VeraCrypt, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Prime95, AIDA64, MATLAB, WPrime, GeekBench 6, 5.2, Handbrake.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - Red Dead Redemption 2
- Fallout 76
- Borderlands 3
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Apex Legends
- Death Stranding
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Last Man Standing
- Valorant
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valheim
- Halo Infinite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Fortnite
- Overwatch
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy for gaming AMD Ryzen 5 3500X or Intel Core i3-13100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13100T | 57% |
Ryzen 5 3500X | 54% |
This value shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100T is 5% better than Ryzen 5 3500X. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13100T | 54% |
Ryzen 5 3500X | 53% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And of course, this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a small game result, look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Horizon Zero Dawn, Hitman 3, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Microsoft Flight Simulator, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Monster Hunter World, League of Legends (LOL), Control, DOTA 2A, Metro Exodus, Battlefield V, Forza Horizon 4, Ghostrunner.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 94.1 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 106.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 59.9 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 100.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.1 | 80.2 | | Overwatch | 87.6 | 86.6 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 73.8 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 53.5 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 83.4 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 89.8 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 88.7 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 2K, FullHD or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13100T | 158% |
Ryzen 5 3500X | 65% |
To make a finishing decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100T is more energy efficient than the Ryzen 5 3500X as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to calculate so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, streaming, programming, video editing or video rendering, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, the CPU uses all threads and cores that it has to the maximum to achieve maximum performance. You will find out this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to find out whether the program that you are going to use on your computer can work in multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to work, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 188 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2294 | 1129 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 358 | 464 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5114 | 2652 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1287 | 1126 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14731 | 7797 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | | Single-Core | 1174 | 2562 | | Multi-Core | 25118 | 13476 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | | Single-Core | 1659 | 1272 | | Multi-Core | 6987 | 5963 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last you. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. If the processor can be overclocked, thereby increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13100T |
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | September 24, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | AM4 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Matisse | | Architecture | x86 | Zen 2 | | Generation | 13 | 3 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.1 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3.6 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 6 | | Threads | 8 | 6 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 4200 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 384KB | | L2 cache | 4 MB | 3MB | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 32MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| 100-000000158
100-100000158CBX
100-100000158MPK
|
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 5 3500X is 5% better than Core i3-13100T in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Ryzen 5 3500X has 2 more core than Core i3-13100T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100T is better: 30
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 5 3500X is better: 7
However, it should be understood that the summary data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should fully trust a simple quantitative comparison. Better to watch benchmarks video and read the opinion of real owners of Intel Core i3-13100T and AMD Ryzen 5 3500X before making a choice which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13100T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
AMD Ryzen 5 3500X Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500U
• Vs Core i7-4790
• Vs Core i7-10510U
• Vs Core i7-4770
• Vs Core i7-7700HQ
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i3-10325
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-9850H
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 3 2200G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Core i5-4690K
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700GE
|
|
|
