 |
Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i7-9700 |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
Let's say there are difficulties with the choice of a processor, you will solve them by reading the full tests Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i7-9700 and decide which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, programming, streaming, rendering. Here is all information from several benchmarks or real streaming and video editing tests. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like 7zip, Furmark, Dolphin Emulator, RealBench, GeekBench 6, 5.2, WPrime, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), AIDA64, VeraCrypt, Blender, Handbrake, PassMark, SuperPi, DaVinci Resolve Studio, Prime95, MATLAB, 3DMark, Gears 5, Blender, PCMark 10, UserBenchmark, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark.
Gaming performance of processors in: - Last Man Standing
- Fortnite
- DOOM: Eternal
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Apex Legends
- Valheim
- Death Stranding
- World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Overwatch
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Valorant
- Cyberpunk 2077
- Fallout 76
- Call of Duty: Modern Warfare and Warzone
- Halo Infinite
- Borderlands 3
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
After reading the results of parallel benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-9700 or Intel Core i3-13100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13100T | 57% |
Core i7-9700 | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100T is 5% better than Core i7-9700. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13100T | 54% |
Core i7-9700 | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor at the moment. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will run games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the final table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: Forza Horizon 4, League of Legends (LOL), PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), Monster Hunter World, DOTA 2A, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Hitman 3, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Half-Life: Alyx, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Horizon Zero Dawn, Metro Exodus, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 95.8 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 108.9 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.0 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 102.3 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.1 | 81.6 | | Overwatch | 87.6 | 88.2 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 75.1 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 54.4 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 84.9 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 91.4 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 90.3 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers participating in the comparisons not only were the equipped with different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: 4K, 2K or FullHD. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13100T | 158% |
Core i7-9700 | 61% |
To make a final decision on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9700 since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, it will be useful to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksIf you plan to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video rendering or video editing, streaming, machine learning, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum efficiency, the processor includes all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Since there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700 | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 209 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2294 | 1491 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 358 | 465 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5114 | 3644 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1287 | 1181 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14731 | 8540 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700 | | Single-Core | 1174 | 2835 | | Multi-Core | 25118 | 13511 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700 | | Single-Core | 1659 | 1195 | | Multi-Core | 6987 | 7637 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most helpful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system later. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in new games. The savings are obvious! Accordingly, you do not need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700 | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151-2 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 5600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | Yes | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-13100T is 11% better than Core i7-9700 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-9700 has 4 more core than Core i3-13100T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100T is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9700 is better: 19
Although it should be understood that the summary data in the table above do not mean that taking them into account you should undividedly trust a simple comparison of these numbers. Better to watch the video tests and read the reviews of real owners of Intel Core i3-13100T and Intel Core i7-9700 before making a decision which of the CPUs to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13100T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i7-9700 Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800H
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Core i9-10850K
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Core i5-9600K
• Vs Core i7-1165G7
• Vs Core i7-8750H
• Vs Core i5-1135G7
• Vs Core i7-7700K
• Vs Core i5-9400F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3400G
• Vs Core i5-8400
• Vs Core i7-6700K
• Vs Core i7-1065G7
• Vs Core i3-10100
• Vs Core i5-10300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 2400G
• Vs Core i7-7700
• Vs Core i7-4790K
• Vs Core i7-6700
• Vs Core i5-1035G1
• Vs Core i5-9300H
• Vs Core i5-8300H
• Vs Ryzen 3 3200G
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i7-10700F
• Vs Core i5-9400
• Vs Ryzen 5 3550H
• Vs Core i9-10980XE
• Vs Core i9-9980XE
• Vs Core i9-9990XE
• Vs Xeon W-3175X
• Vs Core i9-9960X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800H
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS
• Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX
• Vs Apple M1X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800U
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Ryzen 9 4900U
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Core i9-9920X
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Core i3-10320
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i3-10100F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3350G
• Vs Xeon E5-2697R v4
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Xeon W-1290T
• Vs Core i5-10200H
• Vs EPYC 7F32
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Xeon Gold 6130T
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Xeon E5-2680R v4
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11800H
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Core i5-1145G7E
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Core i7-1185GRE
• Vs Core i7-1185G7E
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Core i7-1180G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Core i7-7820X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4800U
• Vs Core i7-6950X
• Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Core i9-10980HK
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i7-9700F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i7-9750HF
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Core i3-8100
• Vs Core i5-6600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500
• Vs Core i5-6500T
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 7800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4355G
|
|
|
