 |
Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i7-9700F |
|
Processor comparisons 31-01-2023
You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests Intel Core i3-13100T vs Intel Core i7-9700F and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.
From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Furmark, Blender, PCMark 10, Gears 5, WPrime, RealBench, 3DMark, SuperPi, PassMark, UserBenchmark, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Blender, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator.
Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Core i7-9700F or Intel Core i3-13100T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
Processor Benchmark
| Core i3-13100T | 57% |
Core i7-9700F | 54% |
The number of this parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Core i3-13100T is 5% better than Core i7-9700F. The data source is several popular tests. Detailed information can be found below.
Gaming performance
Summary result of all game benchmarks.| Core i3-13100T | 54% |
Core i7-9700F | 54% |
The maximum result in this parameter is 100 percent, which is the performance of the most powerful processor currently available. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because the cost of this processor reaches several tens of thousands of dollars. And if it seems to you that the selected CPU has a small game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below.
List of other games in which processors were compared: The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Metro Exodus, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, League of Legends (LOL), Hitman 3, Forza Horizon 4, Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Battlefield V, Ghostrunner, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Half-Life: Alyx, Control, Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Monster Hunter World, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), NBA 2K20.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite | 95.1 | 96.0 | | Valorant | 108.1 | 109.1 | | Cyberpunk 2077 | 60.5 | 61.1 | | Apex Legends | 101.6 | 102.5 | | Call of Duty Warzone | 81.1 | 81.8 | | Overwatch | 87.6 | 88.3 | | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 74.6 | 75.3 | | DOOM Eternal | 54.0 | 54.5 | | Warzone | 84.3 | 85.1 | | Assassin's Creed | 90.8 | 91.6 | | Valheim | 89.7 | 90.5 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks.
The computers that were in the comparisons not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. So the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. To be sure exactly how much performance the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
| Core i3-13100T | 158% |
Core i7-9700F | 67% |
To make a final resolution on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. The newer the processor generation, the better its performance in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Core i3-13100T is more energy efficient than the Core i7-9700F as it consumes less power: 35W vs. 65W. Power consumption is especially important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you need to know its TDP. You need to buy a cooler that has the TDP data specified in the specification was greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksFor example you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for video editing or video rendering, machine learning, streaming, programming, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to reach maximum performance, the processor turns on all threads and cores that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before using the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the software you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the benefit of multi-core mode are unused.
Cinebench 23, 20 an 15
The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700F | | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 208 | 209 | | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2294 | 1491 | | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 358 | 465 | | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5114 | 3644 | | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1287 | 1181 | | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14731 | 8540 |
Passmark
This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700F | | Single-Core | 1174 | 2867 | | Multi-Core | 25118 | 13820 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2
This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700F | | Single-Core | 1659 | 1316 | | Multi-Core | 6987 | 7826 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the processor release date and overclocking capability will be the most useful. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same can be said about overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will still be able to produce maximum FPS even in the newest games. It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer. The economy are obvious!
| Intel Core i3-13100T |
Intel Core i7-9700F | | Announcement date | January 12, 2023 | April 01, 2019 | | Type | Desktop | Desktop | | Socket | FCLGA1700 | FCLGA1151-2 | | Core name | Raptor Lake | Coffee Lake | | Architecture | x86 | x86 | | Generation | 13 | 9 | | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 MHz | 4.7 MHz | | Frequency | 3.4 MHz | 3 MHz | | Cores | 4 | 8 | | Threads | 8 | 8 | | Bus rate | 14 GT/s | 8 GT/s | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 7 nm | 14 nm | | Transistors count | 12400 millions | 5600 millions | | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 65 W | | Memory type | Up to DDR5 4800 MT/s Up to DDR4 3200 MT/s | DDR4-2666 | | Max. Memory | 128 Gb | 128 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4800 | | | Memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 41.6 GB/s | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 4 MB | | | L3 cache | 12 MB | 12 MB | | Overclocking | No | No | | Supports ECC | No | No | | Part number | Expansion Options
| |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Core i3-13100T is 11% better than Core i7-9700F in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Core i7-9700F has 4 more core than Core i3-13100T. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i3-13100T is better: 16
The number of parameters for which Intel Core i7-9700F is better: 18
All the data that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should completely trust a simple comparison of these figures. Be sure to watch benchmarks video and read the reviews of of people who bought Intel Core i3-13100T and Intel Core i7-9700F before making a decision which of the processors to buy for gaming.
Intel Core i3-13100T Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X
• Vs Core i7-13700T
• Vs Core i9-13900F
• Vs Core i9-13900K
• Vs Apple M1 Ultra
• Vs Core i7-13700F
• Vs Core i9-13900
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700X
• Vs Core i9-13900T
• Vs Core i5-13600K
• Vs Core i5-13600KF
• Vs Core i7-13700
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600X
• Vs Core i7-13700KF
• Vs Ryzen 9 5950X
• Vs Core i9-13900KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 7700
• Vs Core i7-13700K
• Vs Core i9-13900KS
• Vs Core i5-13400T
• Vs Core i5-13500T
• Vs Core i9-12900T
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT
• Vs Core i9-11900T
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G
• Vs Core i5-13600T
• Vs Core i3-13100
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900X
• Vs Ryzen 5 7600
• Vs Core i5-13500
• Vs Ryzen 9 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900
• Vs Core i5-12400T
• Vs Ryzen 9 3950X
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 5800
• Vs Core i7-12700T
• Vs Ryzen 9 5900
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700G
• Vs Core i3-12300T
• Vs Core i5-13600
• Vs Core i9-12900
• Vs Core i7-12700KF
• Vs Core i9-12900F
• Vs Core i5-12490F
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i3-12100T
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600G
• Vs Core i3-12300
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i9-11900K
• Vs Core i7-12700
• Vs Core i7-12700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT
• Vs Core i5-12600K
• Vs Core i7-11700B
• Vs Core i5-12400
• Vs Core i5-12500
• Vs Core i5-12500T
• Vs Core i9-12900KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600X
• Vs Ryzen 5 3600
• Vs Core i9-11900KF
• Vs Core i5-12400F
• Vs Ryzen 9 3900X
• Vs Core i3-12100
• Vs Core i9-12900KS
• Vs Core i7-11700
• Vs Core i9-11900KB
• Vs Core i9-12900K
• Vs Core i3-12100F
• Vs Core i7-11700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600X
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3600
• Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
• Vs Core i5-13400
• Vs Ryzen 7 3700X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
• Vs Core i5-12600KF
• Vs Core i7-12700K
• Vs Core i9-11900H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
• Vs Core i7-11700F
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600G
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750G
• Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750GE
• Vs Core i9-11900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Core i9-11900F
• Vs Core i5-12600
• Vs Core i7-10700K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Core i5-12600T
• Vs Core i5-11600KF
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Core i9-9900KS
• Vs Core i9-10900T
• Vs Core i9-9900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Core i7-10700
• Vs Core i9-10900X
• Vs Core i5-11600T
• Vs Core i7-7900X
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i9-10900KF
• Vs Core i5-11600
• Vs Core i5-11400
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Core i9-10900F
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i5-11500T
• Vs Core i9-10900K
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i9-9900KF
• Vs Core i9-10900
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700X
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700GE
• Vs Core i9-9900
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-11500B
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-11700T
• Vs Core i9-9900K
• Vs Core i5-11400F
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Core i5-11400T
• Vs Ryzen 7 3800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-11500
• Vs Core i5-11600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
• Vs Core i7-10700KF
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500
• Vs Core i3-13300
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
Intel Core i7-9700F Processor Comparisons
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600U
• Vs Core i7-6900K
• Vs Core i9-9900T
• Vs Core i7-8700K
• Vs Core i5-10600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600X
• Vs Xeon W-2235
• Vs Ryzen 5 5500U
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600HS
• Vs Core i7-9700K
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700E
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700
• Vs Core i5-10600K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600U
• Vs Core i7-8086K
• Vs Core i7-9700KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4400GE
• Vs Core i5-10600KF
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600H
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
• Vs Core i9-10880H
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600HS
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U
• Vs Ryzen 7 2700
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
• Vs Core i7-10875H
• Vs Core i7-10870H
• Vs Core i9-10885H
• Vs Ryzen 7 1800X
• Vs Ryzen 5 4600GE
• Vs Ryzen 7 4700U
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600E
• Vs Core i7-9700
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500X
• Vs Core i5-10500
• Vs Ryzen 5 2600
• Vs Core i7-10700T
• Vs Core i7-8700
• Vs Core i5-11300H
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U
• Vs Ryzen 3 3300X
• Vs Core i7-9700E
• Vs Core i7-10750H
• Vs Core i5-10400F
• Vs Core i5-10400
• Vs Core i7-11375H
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600
• Vs Core i5-10600T
• Vs Core i7-11370H
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 3100
• Vs Core i5-1145G7
• Vs Core i5-1140G7
• Vs Core i7-1185G7
• Vs Core i7-1160G7
• Vs Ryzen 5 4500U
• Vs Core i7-9750H
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4200GE
• Vs Core i5-1145GRE
• Vs Ryzen 7 1700X
• Vs Core i7-5960X
• Vs Ryzen 3 4300G
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
• Vs Core i7-7800X
• Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
• Vs Core i7-10850H
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300G
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 4500U
• Vs Core i5-11320H
• Vs Core i5-11260H
• Vs Core i7-1195G7
• Vs Core i7-11390H
• Vs Xeon W-10855M
• Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
• Vs Xeon W-11855M
• Vs Celeron 7300
• Vs Celeron 7305
• Vs Pentium 8500
• Vs Pentium 8505
• Vs Core i3-1210U
• Vs Ryzen 5 5625U
• Vs Ryzen 3 5425U
• Vs Core i9-9880H
• Vs Core i9-9980HK
• Vs Core i7-8700B
• Vs Ryzen 5 3500
• Vs Ryzen 5 1600X
• Vs Core i3-N300
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600
• Vs Core i5-13400F
• Vs Core i3-13100F
• Vs Ryzen 7 5700X
• Vs Ryzen 3 1200
• Vs Core i3-13300F
• Vs Ryzen 3 PRO 5350GE
• Vs Ryzen 9 7950X3D
• Vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D
• Vs Ryzen 5 1500X
• Vs Core i7-5820K
• Vs Ryzen 5 5600GE
• Vs Ryzen 3 5300GE
|
|
|
