|
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS vs Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|
Processor comparisons 12-01-2022 You may have difficulties with the choice of a CPU, you will solve them by reading the comprehensive tests AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS vs Intel Xeon W-3175X and understand which is better for games or simple use for video editing, machine learning, streaming, rendering, programming. Here you can find useful information from many benchmarks or real video editing and streaming tests. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Furmark, Blender, PCMark 10, Gears 5, WPrime, RealBench, 3DMark, SuperPi, PassMark, UserBenchmark, 7zip, World of Tanks enCore Benchmark, Handbrake, DaVinci Resolve Studio, AIDA64, Blender, MATLAB, GeekBench 6, 5.2, VeraCrypt, Prime95, Cinebench 23 (20, 15), Dolphin Emulator. Gaming performance of CPUs in: - World of Warcraft: Shadowlands
- Halo Infinite
- Fortnite
- Last Man Standing
- Borderlands 3
- Valheim
- Assassin's Creed Valhalla
- Red Dead Redemption 2
- Death Stranding
- Rainbow Six Siege
- Cyberpunk 2077
- DOOM: Eternal
- Watch Dogs Legion
- Grand Theft Auto V
- Fallout 76
- Valorant
- Call of Duty: Warzone and Modern Warfare
- Overwatch
- Apex Legends
After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy for gaming Intel Xeon W-3175X or AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors Processor Benchmark
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 58% |
Xeon W-3175X | 59% | This parameter shows the performance of the processors in single-threaded and multi-threaded mode. In this comparison, Xeon W-3175X is 1% better than Ryzen 9 6980HS. The data source is several popular tests. More detailed information of the benchmarks is below.
Gaming performance Summary result of all game benchmarks.Ryzen 9 6980HS | 55% |
Xeon W-3175X | 65% | For the maximum in this test, the results of the most powerful processor in the site database are taken. And it is clear that this is a server processor, on which no one will play games. Because this processor costs several tens of thousands of dollars. Therefore, if you think that the selected CPU has a low game result, just look at the FPS that it produces in real games in the summary table below. List of less popular games in which processors were compared: Resident Evil 7 Biohazard, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CS GO), Forza Horizon 4, Control, PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG), League of Legends (LOL), Horizon Zero Dawn, DOTA 2A, Monster Hunter World, Microsoft Flight Simulator, Ghostrunner, Battlefield V, NBA 2K20, Half-Life: Alyx, Metro Exodus, Hitman 3.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite | 97.3 | 116.1 | Valorant | 110.6 | 131.9 | Cyberpunk 2077 | 61.9 | 73.9 | Apex Legends | 103.9 | 124.0 | Call of Duty Warzone | 82.9 | 98.9 | Overwatch | 89.5 | 106.9 | Red Dead Redemption 2 | 76.3 | 91.0 | DOOM Eternal | 55.3 | 66.0 | Warzone | 86.2 | 102.9 | Assassin's Creed | 92.9 | 110.8 | Valheim | 91.8 | 109.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the computer (RAM size and Video Card) and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Cinebench, GeekBench and Passmark becnmarks. The tested computers not only did they have different amounts of RAM and different video cards. But users also tested them at different screen resolutions: FullHD, 2K or 4K. Therefore, the game benchmark data is approximate. But all video cards met the average system requirements of games. You will get more accurate information about how powerful the processor will be in games, if you get acquainted with the benchmarks that are made with the same video card that is installed in your computer.
Power consumption
Ryzen 9 6980HS | 156% |
Xeon W-3175X | 17% | To make a finishing choice on which processor is better, you should also consider the generation of its core. It is clear that the newer the generation, the better the performance of the processor in games and benchmarks, as well as its energy efficiency. In this case the Ryzen 9 6980HS is more energy efficient than the Xeon W-3175X since it has less power consumption: 35W vs. 255W. Power consumption is particularly important for laptops. Also, when choosing a processor cooling system, you must know its TDP. It is necessary to count so that the TDP data specified in the cooler specification is greater than the TDP of the compared processor.
Software benchmarksLet's say you want to use the processor not only for gaming, but also for machine learning, programming, streaming, video rendering or video editing, then first of all you need to pay attention to the performance in multi-threaded mode. In this mode, to achieve maximum performance, the processor uses all cores and threads that it has. You will learn this data from the benchmark tables below. Before you take into account the data from these tests, be sure to check whether the program you are going to use on your computer supports multi-threaded mode. Because there are still many programs that use only one core to run, and all the advantages of multi-core mode turns out to be unnecessary. Cinebench 23, 20 an 15 The results of this benchmark show Single-threaded and Multi-threaded CPU performance | AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS |
Intel Xeon W-3175X | Cinbench 15 Single-core | 261 | 188 | Cinbench 15 Multi-core | 2536 | 5514 | Cinbench 20 Single-core | 610 | 417 | Cinbench 20 Multi-core | 5559 | 12975 | Cinbench 23 Single-core | 1578 | 1112 | Cinbench 23 Multi-core | 14146 | 31350 |
Passmark This popular benchmark displays Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS |
Intel Xeon W-3175X | Single-Core | 3379 | 2147 | Multi-Core | 27970 | 31909 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2 This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS |
Intel Xeon W-3175X | Single-Core | 1643 | 1351 | Multi-Core | 9105 | 27550 |
Comparison of specifications
In the specification comparison table, the most useful will be the the possibility of overclocking it and release date of the processor. The later the processor is released, the longer it will last in your computer. And the easier it will be to upgrade the system in the future. The same benefits from the presence of overclocking. When the processor can be overclocked, increasing its performance, then it will continue to maintain maximum FPS in the newest games. The savings are obvious! It turns out that there is no longer a need to buy a new CPU to enjoy the games any longer.
| AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS |
Intel Xeon W-3175X | Announcement date | January 09, 2022 | January 01, 2019 | Type | Laptop | Desktop | Socket | FP7 | FCLGA3647 | Core name | Rembrandt | Skylake | Architecture | Zen 3+ | x86 | Generation | 6 | 2 | Turbo Frequency | 5 MHz | 3.8 MHz | Frequency | 3.3 MHz | 3.1 MHz | Cores | 8 | 28 | Threads | 16 | 56 | Bus rate | | 8 GT/s | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 14 nm | Transistors count | 10200 millions | 7510 millions | Power consumption (TDP) | 35 W | 255 W | Memory type | DDR5 | DDR4-2666 | Max. Memory | | 512 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | | | L1 cache | 512KB | | L2 cache | 4MB | | L3 cache | 16MB | 38.5 MB | Overclocking | No | Yes | Supports ECC | No | Yes | Part number | FP7:100-000000750 FP7r2:100-000000751
| | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Ryzen 9 6980HS is 6% better than Xeon W-3175X in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Xeon W-3175X has 20 more core than Ryzen 9 6980HS. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption (relevant for laptops).
Result:
The number of parameters for which AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS is better: 15
The number of parameters for which Intel Xeon W-3175X is better: 23 Although it should be realized that all the number that you have looked at here do not mean that taking them into account you should totally trust a simple comparison of these figures. Better to watch the testing video and read the opinion of of people who bought AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS and Intel Xeon W-3175X before deciding which processor to buy for gaming and which not.
AMD Ryzen 9 6980HS Processor Comparisons • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Core i9-11900K • Vs Core i9-9940X • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Core i7-12700H • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Ryzen 9 6980HX • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HX • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i5-12600H • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 6900HS • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Core i7-11700F • Vs Ryzen 7 6800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 7 6800HS • Vs Core i5-12400 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Core i5-12490F • Vs Core i5-12600HL • Vs Ryzen 7 7700X • Vs Ryzen 5 7600X • Vs Core i9-12900KS • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i5-13600K • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Apple M2 Max • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK • Vs Core i9-13900HX • Vs Core i5-13600HX • Vs Core i9-13950HX • Vs Core i7-1360P • Vs Core i5-1350P • Vs Core i5-1340P • Vs Core i5-13500HX • Vs Core i9-13980HX • Vs Core i5-13600H • Vs Core i5-13500H • Vs Core i5-13505H • Vs Core i5-1345U • Vs Core i5-1335U • Vs Core i5-1334U • Vs Core i5-13420H • Vs Core i5-13450HX • Vs Core i7-1355U • Vs Core i7-1365U • Vs Core i3-1315U • Vs Core i3-1305U • Vs Core i7-1370P • Vs Core i7-13620H • Vs Core i7-13650HX • Vs Core i7-13705H • Vs Core i7-13800H • Vs Core i7-13850HX • Vs Core i9-13900H • Vs Core i9-13905H • Vs Ryzen 9 7940HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7840HS • Vs Ryzen 7 7735HS • Vs Ryzen 5 7535HS
Intel Xeon W-3175X Processor Comparisons • Vs Core i9-9980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3900X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900XT • Vs Core i9-10980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 3950X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX • Vs Ryzen 9 5950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX • Vs Core i9-9990XE • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X • Vs Core i9-10900K • Vs Ryzen 7 3800X • Vs Core i9-10850K • Vs Ryzen 7 3700X • Vs Ryzen 5 5600X • Vs Core i7-10700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4800H • Vs Ryzen 5 3600XT • Vs Core i9-9900K • Vs Ryzen 5 3600X • Vs Ryzen 5 3600 • Vs Ryzen 7 2700X • Vs Core i7-10700 • Vs Core i7-10700F • Vs Core i7-10875H • Vs Ryzen 7 2700 • Vs Ryzen 5 4600H • Vs Core i5-10600K • Vs Ryzen 7 1700 • Vs Core i7-9700K • Vs Ryzen 5 2600X • Vs Core i7-8700K • Vs Ryzen 7 4700U • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 • Vs Core i7-9700 • Vs Ryzen 5 3500X • Vs Ryzen 5 2600 • Vs Core i7-8700 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX • Vs Core i9-9960X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900 • Vs Ryzen 7 5700G • Vs Ryzen 7 5800H • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HS • Vs Ryzen 9 5980HX • Vs Apple M1X • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U • Vs Ryzen 7 5800U • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Ryzen 5 5600G • Vs Ryzen 9 4900U • Vs Core i7-11700K • Vs Core i5-11600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE • Vs Ryzen 7 Pro 5750G • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX • Vs Core i9-7980XE • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 • Vs Core i9-10940X • Vs Ryzen 9 3900 • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2950X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX • Vs Core i9-7940X • Vs Core i9-7960X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X • Vs Core i9-10920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990X • Vs Core i9-9920X • Vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X • Vs Ryzen 9 5900HX • Vs Xeon Gold 6242R • Vs Xeon Gold 6246R • Vs EPYC 7502 • Vs Xeon Platinum 8260M • Vs Xeon W-3245 • Vs Xeon W-2275 • Vs Core i9-11900KF • Vs Core i9-11900 • Vs Core i9-11900F • Vs Core i7-11700KF • Vs Core i7-11700 • Vs Ryzen 9 5800 • Vs Ryzen 9 5600X • Vs Ryzen 9 5800X • Vs EPYC 7742 • Vs EPYC 7513 • Vs EPYC 7543 • Vs EPYC 7543P • Vs EPYC 75F3 • Vs EPYC 7713 • Vs EPYC 7663 • Vs EPYC 7643 • Vs EPYC 7763 • Vs EPYC 7713P • Vs EPYC 7453 • Vs EPYC 74F3 • Vs EPYC 7443P • Vs EPYC 7443 • Vs EPYC 7413 • Vs EPYC 73F3 • Vs EPYC 7343 • Vs EPYC 7313P • Vs EPYC 7313 • Vs EPYC 72F3 • Vs Xeon W-3275M • Vs EPYC 7452 • Vs Xeon Gold 6248R • Vs Core i9-11900H • Vs Core i9-11900KB • Vs Core i9-11950H • Vs Core i9-11980HK • Vs Core i7-11700B • Vs EPYC 7272 • Vs Core i9-13900K • Vs Core i7-12800H • Vs Core i7-12650H • Vs Core i7-12700E • Vs Core i7-12700 • Vs Core i7-12700F • Vs Core i7-12700TE • Vs Core i7-12700T • Vs Core i7-12700HE • Vs Core i7-12700K • Vs Core i7-12700KF • Vs Core i5-12600HE • Vs Core i5-12600KF • Vs Core i5-12600K • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650H • Vs Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H • Vs Ryzen 7 PRO 6850HS • Vs Ryzen 5 PRO 6650HS • Vs Ryzen 7 5800X3D • Vs Core i7-12700HL • Vs Core i7-12650HX • Vs Core i7-12800HL • Vs Core i7-12850HX • Vs Core i3-13100 • Vs Core i5-13400 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple M1 Pro • Vs Apple M1 Max • Vs Apple M2 Pro • Vs Core i7-13700HX • Vs Core i7-13700H • Vs Core i9-13700HK • Vs Core i9-13900HK
| |
|